Thread View: misc.test
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Andrew
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 21:50
aerial photo of WTC
Author: Andrew
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 21:50
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 21:50
7 lines
1193 bytes
1193 bytes
This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg (about 800kBytes) Andrew
Re: aerial photo of WTC
Author: Ken
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:41
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:41
10 lines
1355 bytes
1355 bytes
"Andrew" <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote in message news:9qkuf5$i5r$1@news-int.gatech.edu... > This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. > > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg > > (about 800kBytes) INCREDIBLE!
Re: aerial photo of WTC
Author: Andrew
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:35
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:35
26 lines
1959 bytes
1959 bytes
Ken <krp@atlantic.net> wrote: > "Andrew" <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote in message > news:9qkuf5$i5r$1@news-int.gatech.edu... >> This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. >> >> http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg >> >> (about 800kBytes) > INCREDIBLE! I found the high-res version of that photo: http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg It's 15MBytes and 9372x9372 pixels. I've found that netscape refuses to open it. Explorer seems to work though. I made a medium-res version out of the high-res: http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-med.jpg It's 3.8MBytes and 3124x3124 pixels. The original, smaller version is now: http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg Andrew
Re: aerial photo of WTC
Author: Leszek
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:19
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:19
29 lines
2052 bytes
2052 bytes
In fl.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > Ken <krp@atlantic.net> wrote: >> "Andrew" <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote in message >> news:9qkuf5$i5r$1@news-int.gatech.edu... >>> This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. >>> >>> http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg >>> >>> (about 800kBytes) >> INCREDIBLE! > I found the high-res version of that photo: > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg > It's 15MBytes and 9372x9372 pixels. I've found that netscape refuses > to open it. Explorer seems to work though. > I made a medium-res version out of the high-res: > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-med.jpg > It's 3.8MBytes and 3124x3124 pixels. > The original, smaller version is now: > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg For the dial-up weenies, here's a thumbnail: http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-tiny.jpg (200kBytes 781x781 pixels) Leszek
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads