Thread View: misc.test
11 messages
11 total messages
Started by Andrew
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:45
WTC photo
Author: Andrew
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:45
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:45
7 lines
1159 bytes
1159 bytes
This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg (about 800kBytes) Andrew
Re: WTC photo
Author: Andrew
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:55
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:55
14 lines
1536 bytes
1536 bytes
cypher@punk.net wrote: > In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. > # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg > # (about 800kBytes) > Wow. I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg Andrew
Re: WTC photo
Author: Andrew
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:54
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:54
20 lines
1737 bytes
1737 bytes
Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > cypher@punk.net wrote: >> In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: >> # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. >> # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg >> # (about 800kBytes) >> Wow. > I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. > The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg > Andrew And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg Andrew
Re: WTC photo
Author: -
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:40
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:40
22 lines
1810 bytes
1810 bytes
Andrew wrote: > > cypher@punk.net wrote: > > In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > > # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. > > # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg > > # (about 800kBytes) > > > Wow. > > I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. > > The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg It's the same exact picture. All the cars are at the exact same locations on the streets. > > Andrew
Re: WTC photo
Author: -
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:45
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:45
26 lines
2046 bytes
2046 bytes
Andrew wrote: > > Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > > cypher@punk.net wrote: > >> In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > >> # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. > >> # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg > >> # (about 800kBytes) > > >> Wow. > > > I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. > > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. > > The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg > > Andrew > > And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: > > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg Great photo. Are there more of these somewhere on the web? > Andrew
Re: WTC photo
Author: -
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:03
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:03
28 lines
2099 bytes
2099 bytes
Andrew wrote: > > Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > > cypher@punk.net wrote: > >> In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > >> # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. > >> # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg > >> # (about 800kBytes) > > >> Wow. > > > I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. > > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. > > The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg > > Andrew > > And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: > > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg Do you happen to know what the hundreds of light blue vans are all around the perimeter of the site? FEMA? > > Andrew
Re: WTC photo
Author: Ron Natalie
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:56
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:56
12 lines
1683 bytes
1683 bytes
cypher@punk.net wrote: > # And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: > # > # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg > > That one ain't there! Sure it is, but your browser probably gags tryign to load it. I did "Save Link As" to put it to a disk file.
Re: WTC photo
Author: -
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:59
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:59
28 lines
2245 bytes
2245 bytes
cypher@punk.net wrote: > > In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > # Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > # > cypher@punk.net wrote: > # >> In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > # >> # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. > # >> # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg > # >> # (about 800kBytes) > # > # >> Wow. > # > # > I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. > # > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. > # > The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg > # > Andrew > # > # > # And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: > # > # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg > > That one ain't there! Netscape doesn't find it, but IE does. On his homepage he has a netscape hidden message.(about:mozilla)
Re: WTC photo
Author: -
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:03
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:03
34 lines
2264 bytes
2264 bytes
cypher@punk.net wrote: > > In nyc.general Ron Natalie <ron@sensor.com> wrote: > # > # > # cypher@punk.net wrote: > # > # > # And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: > # > # > # > # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg > # > > # > That one ain't there! > # > # Sure it is, but your browser probably gags tryign to load it. > # I did "Save Link As" to put it to a disk file. > > Thanks for the general idea, got it. > > I'm on a Solaris 8 boxen using Netscape. > > I created this file: > > <html> > <a href="http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg">click</a> > </html> > > Loaded it using URL file:/tmp/file, > held down the shift key and clicked, > yielding the download box. > > Transferred it to my iMac and was able to open it in PhotoShop. My 32mb ram really strained on this one.
Re: WTC photo
Author: Tchaka
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:43
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:43
34 lines
2266 bytes
2266 bytes
PHENOMENAL!! It goes all the way from the Southern tip of Chelsea Piers down. I rollerbladed all the way down to Battery Park with a friend in August and see clearly (minus the dust) where we were. Who'da thought 5 weeks later the scenery would change. I sure am glad I went up to NYC to catch one last sight. What a great pic! Much love to our NYC brethren. T (in DC) On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC), Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: >Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: >> cypher@punk.net wrote: >>> In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: >>> # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. >>> # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg >>> # (about 800kBytes) > >>> Wow. > >> I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. >> http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. >> The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg >> Andrew > > >And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: > >http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg > >Andrew
Re: WTC photo
Author: Leszek
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:09
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:09
21 lines
1983 bytes
1983 bytes
In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: > Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: >> cypher@punk.net wrote: >>> In nyc.general Andrew <andrew@kill-9.com> wrote: >>> # This is the best photo of the WTC area I've seen yet. >>> # http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg >>> # (about 800kBytes) >>> Wow. >> I've substituted a slightly higher resolution picture. >> http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo.jpg is now a 3.8MByte 3124x3124 pixel image. >> The original 1687x1687 image is now http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-small.jpg >> Andrew > And for the truly daring... the 9372x9372 pixel, 15MByte version: > http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-big.jpg For the dial-up pukes, here's a thumbnail: http://kill-9.com/wtc-photo-tiny.jpg (200kytes 781x781 pixels) Leszek
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads