Re: cit80 terminfo wanted

Article View: misc.wanted

Article #2483

#2483

From: jesup
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1987 16:23

18 lines
1035 bytes

In article <589@rpics.RPI.EDU> schoff@rpics.RPI.EDU (Martin Schoffstall) writes:
>
>Does anyone have such a beast?
>
>Thanks,

>marty schoffstall
>schoff@csv.rpi.edu
>seismo!rpics!schoff

Can you not just use the vt100 terminfo? (Cit80's being, essentially,
vt100 clones...)

--Scanner (Eric Luce)

ARPA:	luce@ge-crd.arpa
UUCP:	..!seismo!rpics!rpiacm!scanner
BITNET:	useretta@rpitsmts.bitnet

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1076@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cuae2!ihnp4!chinet!steinmetz!jesup

References: <589@rpics.RPI.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cuae2!ihnp4!chinet!steinmetz!jesup
From: jesup@steinmetz.UUCP
Newsgroups: misc.wanted,comp.terminals
Subject: Re: cit80 terminfo wanted
Message-ID: <1076@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 9-Jan-87 11:23:45 EST
Article-I.D.: steinmet.1076
Posted: Fri Jan  9 11:23:45 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Jan-87 06:01:17 EST
References: <589@rpics.RPI.EDU>
Reply-To: ..!seismo!rpics!rpicam!scanner
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 18
Keywords: SYSV strikes again
Summary: cit80's... aren't they vt100 clones?

Reply to Parent Message