🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.writing
Article #1127

Question on parenthetical style

#1127
From: Marc Schwarz
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 00:17
22 lines
1158 bytes
What is the preferred style for parenthetical expressions? 

I have seen: 

   1. Mary had a little lamb (and the doctor died of shock).

   2. Mary had a little lamb (The doctor died of shock.).

   3. Mary had a little lamb. (The doctor died of shock.)

This is actually two questions:  Should parentheticals 
be dependent or independent clauses?  In addition, should
independent parentheticals be embedded within another
independent clause? (This presumes paretheticals should,
in most cases, be independent clauses.) In practice, I tend
to use the first example, the notion being that an independent
clause can stand on its own (no matter how tangential it is).

Marc.
-=-
schwarz@cs.yale.edu
AKA schwarz@spunky.cs.nyu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1ec221INNi41@GIRAFFE.ZOO.CS.YALE.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!yale!yale.edu!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!yale!yale.edu!not-for-mail
From: schwarz-marc@cs.yale.edu (Marc Schwarz)
Newsgroups: misc.writing
Subject: Question on parenthetical style
Date: 17 Nov 1992 19:17:05 -0500
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept., New Haven, CT 06520-2158
Lines: 22
Distribution: na
Message-ID: <1ec221INNi41@GIRAFFE.ZOO.CS.YALE.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: giraffe.zoo.cs.yale.edu