Article View: misc.writing
Article #1131Re: Question on parenthetical style
From: Len Olszewski
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:22
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:22
57 lines
3076 bytes
3076 bytes
In article <1ec221INNi41@GIRAFFE.ZOO.CS.YALE.EDU>, schwarz-marc@cs.yale.edu (Marc Schwarz) writes: |> What is the preferred style for parenthetical expressions? |> |> I have seen: |> |> 1. Mary had a little lamb (and the doctor died of shock). |> |> 2. Mary had a little lamb (The doctor died of shock.). |> |> 3. Mary had a little lamb. (The doctor died of shock.) |> |> This is actually two questions: Should parentheticals |> be dependent or independent clauses? In addition, should |> independent parentheticals be embedded within another |> independent clause? (This presumes paretheticals should, |> in most cases, be independent clauses.) In practice, I tend |> to use the first example, the notion being that an independent |> clause can stand on its own (no matter how tangential it is). |> |> Marc. |> -=- |> schwarz@cs.yale.edu |> AKA schwarz@spunky.cs.nyu.edu Where I work, parentheticals traditionally contain clarifying information, an example, a citation for another work, or a reference to material elsewhere in the document. Usually, parenthenticals are either independent clauses or complete sentences. This is a matter of convention here, though; I'm not aware of any hard and fast rule. We do it this way to be consistent with each other. As a software company, we have a number of rules for using parentheses in equations and in code. If we refer to a symbol in text, we usually show the symbol in parentheses, such as: "..Logical operators include the equal sign (=),...." For parentheticals within sentences, we punctuate outside of the parentheses, as in: "..You can specify a quoted literal containing embedded commas (for example, "1,000.00"). And so on...." Complete parenthetical sentences are punctuated within parentheses, such as: "...The BLAH= option produces a separate report. (The BLAH statement produces a message in the error log.) And so forth..." What you do, of course, is completely up to you. <-------------------------------^-------------------------------------> |Len Olszewski, Technical Writer| "The fish." | |saslpo@unx.sas.com | -Salvador Dali | |---------------------------------------------------------------------| | Opinions this ludicrous are mine. Reasonable opinions will cost you.| <-------------------------------v------------------------------------->
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bxx19u.JD4@unx.sas.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!saslpoReferences:
<1ec221INNi41@GIRAFFE.ZOO.CS.YALE.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!saslpo From: saslpo@stevens.unx.sas.com (Len Olszewski) Subject: Re: Question on parenthetical style Originator: saslpo@stevens.unx.sas.com Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events) Message-ID: <Bxx19u.JD4@unx.sas.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:22:42 GMT Distribution: na References: <1ec221INNi41@GIRAFFE.ZOO.CS.YALE.EDU> Nntp-Posting-Host: stevens.unx.sas.com Organization: SAS Institute Inc. Lines: 57