🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.writing
Article #1302

Re: *** Why is rewriting bad ?

#1302
From: Len Olszewski
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:25
38 lines
2456 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.203546.45088@datamark.co.nz>, thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle) writes:
|> In article <77124@apple.apple.COM> chuq@Apple.COM (Crow's Friend Timmy) writes:
|> >
|> >I know, I know. Injecting facts into a USENET argument is worth two demerits.
|>
|> Yes, but you're just as bad as a Nazi. :-)
|>
|> Now this thread has officially reached rock-bottom, perhaps we could
|> move on?

Heh, heh...ok by me.

|> ObWriting : When writing a manual, do you index as you go (and risk
|> all sorts of incompatibilities) or do you index after the bulk of the
|> manual is written?

After its finished. The way we lay it out here, setting the final page 
breaks is an important pre-index requirement. Also, you never know 
what's going to be in or out in some books, really, until the last
minute. You've already mentioned consistency as good reason to wait.
Also, the editors get the book last, and they can introduce all kinds of 
changes.

|>
|> --
|>     Thomas Beagle | thomas@datamark.co.nz           Work: 64 4 233 8186
|>  Technical Writer | thomas@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz     Home: 64 4 499 3832
|>    Wellington, NZ | Yes, I do have long ears, a black nose, and a tail.
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                              |
                                     No, you don't mean it, do you? 8-)
<-------------------------------^------------------------------------->
|Len Olszewski, Technical Writer |"The things you see when don't have |
|saslpo@unx.sas.com|Cary, NC, USA| your gun." - My buddy, Jim McD.    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Opinions this ludicrous are mine. Reasonable opinions will cost you.|
<-------------------------------v------------------------------------->
Technical Details
Message-ID: <C19EqC.6s5@unx.sas.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!saslpo
References: <1993Jan19.172314.23411@emr1.emr.ca> <ak09852@pro-harold.cts.com> <77124@apple.apple.COM> <1993Jan21.203546.45088@datamark.co.nz>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!saslpo
From: saslpo@stevens.unx.sas.com (Len Olszewski)
Subject: Re: *** Why is rewriting bad ?
Originator: saslpo@stevens.unx.sas.com
Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
Message-ID: <C19EqC.6s5@unx.sas.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:25:22 GMT
References: <1993Jan19.172314.23411@emr1.emr.ca> <ak09852@pro-harold.cts.com> <77124@apple.apple.COM> <1993Jan21.203546.45088@datamark.co.nz>
Nntp-Posting-Host: stevens.unx.sas.com
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
Lines: 39