Article View: misc.writing
Article #1305Re: Not revising - with a twist
From: Nigel Ling
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:13
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:13
38 lines
2639 bytes
2639 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.213705.6410@digi.lonestar.org> gpalo@digi.lonestar.org (Gerry Palo) writes: >This idea of not rewriting is fascinating as a possible exercise. I have >had a couple of articles published, the first one two years ago, my first >ever (at age 47). It was an exhausting process and I worked on it and rewrote >it multiple times. I was very happy with the results and others, including >the editor, said so too (it even got translated into German and published >in another magazine). But I realized that this was no way to run a railroad, >and it really was a strain on my family for me to spend so much time in front >of the word processor for such a long stretch. Since then I have written a >couple more and got two published. I still take too much time, but I am >improving. Well, as far as I'm concerned rewriting is part and parcel of writing. With practice you will probably find that your rewriting will not be quite so extensive, but don't imagine for a minute that you will reach the stage where a first draft is the best you can do. Writing is very hard to do well. All the outstanding writers whose opinion I've read say that they rewrite and rewrite. If one cannot be bothered to make a piece as good as possible, one is liable to produce nothing but rubbish - which may help explain why there is so much rubbish published. > >As far as using Heinlein's rule, I wonder if anyone has ever tried it, with >the added twist that when you finish a piece, if it is not worth submitting, >then throw it away and start something new - don't submit it at all. >I admit this would be very hard to do, but the discipline might help one to >improve one's overall skills and productivity. I would think also that the >act of throwing a piece away might help in detaching one's ego from the >work, something I find very difficult to do. It is not uncommon for writers to abandon pieces, for all sorts of reasons. Or they throw away the whole thing and start afresh. Highly acclaimed writers do this. If something you produce is no good and you feel you can do nothing with, it makes sense to throw it away and try again. Nigel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan22.151350.12351@syma.sussex.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!syma!mapd1References:
<1993Jan21.213705.6410@digi.lonestar.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!syma!mapd1 From: mapd1@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Nigel Ling) Subject: Re: Not revising - with a twist Message-ID: <1993Jan22.151350.12351@syma.sussex.ac.uk> Organization: University of Sussex References: <1993Jan21.213705.6410@digi.lonestar.org> Distribution: misc.writing Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:13:50 GMT Lines: 41