Article View: misc.writing
Article #1311Re: *** Why is rewriting bad ?
From: Karen Fegley
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 23:02
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 23:02
27 lines
1474 bytes
1474 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.203546.45088@datamark.co.nz> thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle) writes: > > . > . > . > > ObWriting : When writing a manual, do you index as you go (and risk > all sorts of incompatibilities) or do you index after the bulk of the > manual is written? > If I have my druthers, I wait to index until the bulk of the manual is written, the draft has been tech reviewed at least once, and I have incorporated the review comments. I find that the closer I am to a complete draft, the more consistent are the index hits that I insert. Also, because most of the of the *major* changes have usually been made to the manual at this point, I spend less time indexing material that gets dumped anyway and/or going back to index new material that gets inserted. (I don't always have my druthers...) This is just my personal preference. I know some of the folks around here swear by the index-as-you-go technique. Karen Fegley Stratus Computer, Inc. kaz@vineland.pubs.stratus.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1jpudqINN22g@transfer.stratus.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!transfer.stratus.com!transfer.stratus.com!usenetReferences:
<1993Jan21.203546.45088@datamark.co.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!transfer.stratus.com!transfer.stratus.com!usenet From: kaz@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Karen Fegley) Newsgroups: misc.writing Subject: Re: *** Why is rewriting bad ? Date: 22 Jan 1993 23:02:18 GMT Organization: Stratus Computer Inc, Marlboro MA Lines: 27 Message-ID: <1jpudqINN22g@transfer.stratus.com> References: <1993Jan21.203546.45088@datamark.co.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogo.pubs.stratus.com