🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.writing
Article #1350

Re: Indexing (was: *** Why is rewriting bad?)

#1350
From: Thomas Beagle
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 23:43
37 lines
2263 bytes
In article <C1HDzD.6G2@unx.sas.com> sasjcs@canoe.unx.sas.com (Joan Stout) writes:
>
>In article <1993Jan26.181754.9854@sqwest.wimsey.bc.ca>, marcy@sqwest.wimsey.bc.ca (Marcy Thompson) writes:
>
>|> >I can't help thinking that indexing by hand should be banned under the
>|> >Geneva Convention. :-)
>|>
>|> No argument here. I think it also contravenes the constitutional ban on
>|> cruel and unusual punishment if you happen to be in the US. :-)
>
>Hey! Some of us *like* indexing and some of us do it for a living.
>(In my case, only *part* of my living.) Some of us even like it 
>enough to do most of it by hand. I have indexing software to take
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>care of the real drudgery, but a professional indexer knows that
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^        
>computers can't index.

I think we could be getting confused here.

When I talk about indexing by hand, I'm referring to going through the
proofs and writing down entries somewhere on a list. If someone needs
to insert a page, all the entries get stuffed up.

When using a computer, I am not talking about making one of those
horrible keyword indexes where someone has entered a list of words and
the index consists of every incidence of those words.

I use a computer {xe "Index:with computer"} to index by entering tags
{xe "Tags:entering index tags"} {xe "Index:tags"} throughout the text.
The tags contain the information that I want shown in the index entry.
{xe "Index:compiling list"} The computer then compiles the index for
me.
-- 
    Thomas Beagle | thomas@datamark.co.nz           Work: 64 4 233 8186
 Technical Writer | thomas@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz     Home: 64 4 499 3832
   Wellington, NZ |   A man without a woman is like tea without sugar.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan27.234359.49579@datamark.co.nz>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!ferrari.datamark.co.nz!thomas
References: <1993Jan25.192738.51901@datamark.co.nz> <1993Jan26.181754.9854@sqwest.wimsey.bc.ca> <C1HDzD.6G2@unx.sas.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!ferrari.datamark.co.nz!thomas
From: thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle)
Subject: Re: Indexing (was: *** Why is rewriting bad?)
Message-ID: <1993Jan27.234359.49579@datamark.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 23:43:59 GMT
References: <1993Jan25.192738.51901@datamark.co.nz> <1993Jan26.181754.9854@sqwest.wimsey.bc.ca> <C1HDzD.6G2@unx.sas.com>
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.
Lines: 37