Article View: misc.writing
Article #1372Re: Writing Erotica
From: Nigel Ling
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:25
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:25
24 lines
1505 bytes
1505 bytes
In article <1993Jan27.163418.23913@digi.lonestar.org> gpalo@digi.lonestar.org (Gerry Palo) writes: [...] > >As for the literary quality of purely pornographic books, I >heard from the instructor of a writing class I took that >almost all successful writers have written porn books, and >most of those who don't command high royalties regularly >do it. These are those 175 page paperbacks for which they >receive about $1,000 flat fee, which a seasoned writer can >crank out in a week or so. It comes in handy when the >rent is due. Does anyone in this thread know whether this is >true? Almost *all* successful writers have written porno books? Well, I can imagine how that instructor defines successful writers! I'm not much interested in the difference between erotica and porn, although I will say that books containing rude bits which were written before explicit stuff became printable are more likely to shape up to the label erotic, inasmuch as their authors had to use art and subtlety to convey the sex. Nigel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan28.122553.18935@syma.sussex.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!fulcrum!bham!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!syma!mapd1References:
<1993Jan26.153706.12066@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <JJAS.93Jan26214908@acs.nntp-read.bu.edu> <1993Jan27.163418.23913@digi.lonestar.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!fulcrum!bham!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!syma!mapd1 From: mapd1@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Nigel Ling) Subject: Re: Writing Erotica Message-ID: <1993Jan28.122553.18935@syma.sussex.ac.uk> Organization: University of Sussex References: <1993Jan26.153706.12066@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <JJAS.93Jan26214908@acs.nntp-read.bu.edu> <1993Jan27.163418.23913@digi.lonestar.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:25:53 GMT Lines: 26