🚀 go-pugleaf

I used think having the peep hole in a camera ground to your prescription
would be a good idea, though now they have auto-focus which I don't have.
Even that is out of date now, I suppose. Then there's digital, but I haven't
done that yet either. I'm way behind the times, but I've gotten good
pictures with my AE-1 at different times. Usually my best pictures were
mostly good luck, but maybe not because it happened a lot. Someone said
knowing music was a help because you learn to get everything correct and you
have a sense of artistry too. Pictures on a computer are nice, but sometimes
it's nice to have a picture you can hold and show people.
>
Bryna

----------
In article <3b1d5f11.3937433@news.newsguy.com>, phideaux@mcmsys.com
(Phideaux) wrote:


>On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:53:09 -0400, "Dinty W. Moore"
><dinty@charter.net> wrote:
>
>>I am 45, write books for a living off and on, and when I'm deep in the
>>throes of a deadline it is not uncommon for me to stare at my computer
>>screen for four or five hours at a spell.  The problem is, I am 45, and
>>eyestrain and tiredness are making my normal writing pace very hard to
>>sustain.  Anyone else experiencing this as their eyes age?  Any strategies
>>to cope?
>>
>>I wear progressive bifocals, and it has occurred to me that maybe I need
>>special "reading" glasses set for the distance from my nose to the computer.
>>Anyone else tried this strategy?
>>
>
>I have a pair of bifocals for daily routine, a pair of reading glasses
>(+1.75, from Wal-Mart) for when I'm in bed and don't need to see
>anything but the book, and a pair (+1.50 from Wal-Mart) for computer
>use. 
>
>
>Someday I'm going to have a computer screen ground to my prescription,
>but until then, the cheap reading glasses are ideal for
>single-distance use, and it keeps the expensive bifocals from wearing
>out.
>
>
>Phideaux
>___________
>This tagline is added for your protection. Do not read
>this post if the tagline is missing or incomple