Article View: misc.writing
Article #798Re: Screenwriter's Product
From: Jeff Sullivan
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 20:55
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 20:55
51 lines
2806 bytes
2806 bytes
In article <1992Sep29.180836.10282@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> ren@Turing.ORG (Karen Prestemon) writes: >In article <22491@venera.isi.edu> jas@ISI.EDU (Jeff Sullivan) writes: >>In article <1992Sep25.221406.25801@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> ren@Turing.ORG (Karen Prestemon) writes: >> >>> >A pathetic attempt at being humerous... > >>>This is the stuff Oscar dreams are made of. >>> >> >>Ouch! Heh. A little bitter, eh? >> >>jas > >Bitter, no. Realistic, yes. Take Ghost for example. In Bruce Joel Rubin's >first drafts, Demi Moore's character was a sculptor, but one of the producer's >reworked it so that she ended up a potter. Sure, it made for a sexy >scene, but it was done BECAUSE THE PRODUCER'S WIFE WAS INTO POTTERY-MAKING. I fail to see this as a signififcant change. The rationale behind it may have been foolish, but the change was minimal. >Or take Pretty Woman, which ended up looking nothing like Three Thousand, >the original script the movie was loosely based on, where the Julia >Roberts' character grows up, gets a brain, and leaves Richard Gere, and >where the Laura San Giacomo character overdoses. I would have prefered >to see that movie over the drivel that was eventually made. Of course, >the role probably demanded a little too much of Julia Roberts (like she >plays a strong, intelligent young woman). Frankly, I agree with you here. This is an example of Hollywood at its worst(?), but the movie DID make a boatload of dough, and *that's* what the Producer's job is -- to make the movie a success. Now, why a producer would buy "3000" and then turn it into "Pretty Woman," I have no idea... >I lament the death of artistic integrity. If that makes me appear bitter, >then I am a bitter woman! *sob* I have to chuckle at the thought of the phrase "artistic integrity" mentioned in the context of Hollywood. It is truly show business, not show art. jas -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeffrey A. Sullivan | Research Scientist et al. jas@isi.edu (Internet) | Information Sciences Institute 72511,402 (Compuserve) | University of Southern California
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<22519@venera.isi.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!isi.edu!venera.isi.edu!jasReferences:
<DONAHUE.92Sep25131054@atlantis.csc.ti.com> <1992Sep25.221406.25801@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <22491@venera.isi.edu> <1992Sep29.180836.10282@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!isi.edu!venera.isi.edu!jas From: jas@ISI.EDU (Jeff Sullivan) Newsgroups: misc.writing Subject: Re: Screenwriter's Product Message-ID: <22519@venera.isi.edu> Date: 30 Sep 92 20:55:47 GMT References: <DONAHUE.92Sep25131054@atlantis.csc.ti.com> <1992Sep25.221406.25801@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <22491@venera.isi.edu> <1992Sep29.180836.10282@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: news@isi.edu Organization: USC-ISI Lines: 51 In-reply-to: ren@Turing.ORG's message of 29 Sep 92 18:08:36 GMT