Article View: misc.writing
Article #832Re: Carefull, studied splatting
From: EDWARD CRAIG HYATT
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 21:19
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 21:19
50 lines
2516 bytes
2516 bytes
In article <15928@mindlink.bc.ca> Alan_Barclay@mindlink.bc.ca (Alan Barclay) writes: >In a message #4543731 Fred Welden says: > >"What you want >to do, in my arrogant opinion, is to splat down what you think you want >to say on the page as close to all-at-once as you can manage. Then go > (condensed) >In _my_ arrogant opinion, what a one is better off doing is learning to >write clearly the first time. Then you don't have to rewrite half as much. > (condensed) >I like the analogy of the Zen painter. As a novice the painter will study > (condensed) >beautiful work in one sitting without corrections. > >Alan Barclay > >alan_barclay@mindlink.bc.ca I don't agree that writing perfect copy the first time is a sort of nirvana that every writer tries to reach. I think the "splat it down" vs. "review each sentence" question is a matter of personal style. If you prefer to make a rough pass and dump your thoughts on paper for later editing, that doesn't make you less skillful than a writer who produces perfect copy the first time (all things being equal). The dump-and-review writer takes time to revise the work as a whole, and the sentence-by-sentence writer takes time to revise each sentence. Personally, I prefer the dump-and-review method. In fact, I sometimes use a tape recorder to save my thoughts, since I find talking less distracting than typing (also, I do my best thinking while on a stroll around the block). I then transcribe my notes and munge them with a text editor. I also use a top down approach to writing, where I get the main parts down and do the large-scale corrections first. I then fill in the detailed pieces in a sort of refining process. I'm not dogmatic about the method-- sometimes I write some of the detailed low-level text first, and then I incorporate it in the overall plan. I think the style you choose has to do with how you think, and you should use whatever helps you write most effectively. -- -------------------- Craig Hyatt NCSU@Raleigh, NC USA echyatt@eos.ncsu.edu --------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct6.211953.6059@ncsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!gatech!taco!echyattReferences:
<15928@mindlink.bc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!gatech!taco!echyatt From: echyatt@eos.ncsu.edu (EDWARD CRAIG HYATT) Subject: Re: Carefull, studied splatting Message-ID: <1992Oct6.211953.6059@ncsu.edu> Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System) Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos References: <15928@mindlink.bc.ca> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 21:19:53 GMT Lines: 50