Article View: misc.writing
Article #879Re: TECHNICAL: online/on-line
From: Jeff Jungblut
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 23:58
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 23:58
38 lines
2486 bytes
2486 bytes
In <Bx8wCp.2ov@da_vinci.it.uswc.uswest.com> bjones@lookout.it.uswc.uswest.com (Brent Jones) writes: >>>> Jeff Jungblut writes: >>>> >>>> In my own writing, I usually use on-line except when referring to online >>>> help, in which case I spell it as one word. >>Considering I'm also usually the editor, it stays as I wrote it. (In the >>case of online vs on-line vs on line, at least.) > >I'm not sure what you mean here. You say you usually use "on-line" >unless you are referring to "online help." Do you mean that you would >write "on-line information" and "on-line access" but would write "online >help"? As all of these strings have essentially the same grammatical >structure, I'm not sure how you would justify the inconsistent >usage. Using "on-line" after the modified word in the sentence would >also fly in the face of convention--most sources would recommend "on >line." You would hyphenate the compound modifier if the reader is likely to >momentarily read the first part of the compound, "on," as an adjective, >which I don't think is true in this particular case. A sample sentence >would be, "The help screens are on line." > >Just curious. Conventions are conventions, and not altars to worship at >(at which to worship? :-)), but they should probably be logical and >internally consistent. This is especially true in technical >documentation. I'm not consistent in that respect. Here are some examples of how I use it: "Make sure the printer is on line and selected." "Press Command-? for online help." "You use a modem for on-line communications with a remote computer." My exception to the rule is "online help". The only reason I do this is because I've seen "online help" spelled this way in most documentation and magazine articles, so that's my argument for consistency. According to the rules, it should be "on-line", not "online".
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<k757576@pro-amber.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!crash!<pro-amber!jeff> id <m0mo0pX-0000YAC@crash.cts.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 92 16: 48 PST id <k757576@pro-amber.cts.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 92 15: 59 PSTReferences:
<Bx8wCp.2ov@da_vinci.it.uswc.uswest.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!crash!<pro-amber!jeff> id <m0mo0pX-0000YAC@crash.cts.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 92 16: 48 PST id <k757576@pro-amber.cts.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 92 15: 59 PST From: jeff@pro-amber.cts.com (Jeff Jungblut) Subject: Re: TECHNICAL: online/on-line Organization: ProLine [pro-amber] -- Spring Valley, Ca Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 15:58:40 PST Message-ID: <k757576@pro-amber.cts.com> In-Reply-To: bjones@lookout.it.uswc.uswest.com (Brent Jones) References: <Bx8wCp.2ov@da_vinci.it.uswc.uswest.com> Lines: 38