🚀 go-pugleaf

"Lester E. Rees" <retselseer@uswest.net> wrote in message news:<DAXq7.1805$N67.922219@news.uswest.net>...
> American Dissident Voices Broadcast of September 22, 2001
> 
> Who Is Guilty?
> By Dr. William Pierce
> 
> Hello!
> 
> Observing the responses to last week's attacks on the Pentagon and the
> World Trade Center has been interesting, to say the least. It has been
> 11 days now, and nearly every spokesman for the controlled media and for
> the government has been avoiding the obvious question: "Why was the
> United States attacked?"
> 
> Nearly all of them are afraid of that question; they are pretending that
> there is no answer to that question, that there was no reason for the
> attack, that it was an unprovoked attack -- because the answer to the
> question, "Why was America attacked?" also is obvious. We were attacked
> because we have been letting ourselves be used to do all of Israel's
> dirty work in the Middle East. We were attacked because we have
> supported -- militarily or diplomatically or financially -- every bit of
> aggression and every atrocity Israel has committed against its neighbors
> for the past half-century. Everyone in the world with even half a brain
> understands that, even if talking about it is considered Politically
> Incorrect.
> 
> I've been warning about reprisals against the United States for many
> years. Seven years ago, on February 25, 1994, an American Jew, Baruch
> Goldstein, walked into a mosque in Hebron and machine-gunned
> Palestinians at prayer, killing 29 of them before running out of
> ammunition and being beaten to death by the Palestinian survivors. This
> act of mass murder immediately made Goldstein a saint for religious Jews
> everywhere. They built a shrine to him near Hebron, and Jews from the
> United States and other countries still make pilgrimages to this shrine.
> 
> There were no reprisals from the Palestinians at the time, and the mass
> media in the United States barely mentioned the massacre, even though
> the murderer, Goldstein, was an American. But the Palestinians -- and
> Muslims everywhere -- remember such things. They blame not just the
> Jews, but also the people who finance and arm and shelter the Jews: that
> is, they blame America. And right after the massacre I warned all of my
> fellow Americans in an article I wrote for my magazine National
> Vanguard. The article was titled "Stay Out of Tall Buildings," and it
> reported the massacre and the minimal response of the media here, and
> then it warned, and I quote: "New Yorkers who work in tall office
> buildings -- anything close to the size of the World Trade Center --
> might consider wearing hardhats to work for the next few months."
> 
> Well, of course, it took the Muslims more than a few months, and there
> were many more American provocations meanwhile. But last week the
> response eventually came. Of course there had been lesser responses
> earlier -- the bombing of a couple of American embassies in Africa and
> of the U.S. Navy destroyer, the USS Cole, for example -- but those
> events were a long way from here, and to most Americans they weren't
> real: hardly enough to distract them from the latest ball game on TV.
> What happened last week finally caught the attention of the American
> people. It's about time that Americans began to pay attention to such
> things.
> 
> Unfortunately, the great majority of Americans still get all of their
> opinions and attitudes from TV, and so they will not learn what they
> should learn from last week's attacks. What they're learning from TV is
> that the attacks were "unprovoked," that the attackers were "cowards,"
> and that "we'll smoke them out of their holes, by golly." They're also
> taking to heart a lot of slogans along the lines of: "We're the greatest
> country on earth, and these attacks will only unite us and help us all
> pull together." When real lemmings hear slogans like that they become
> misty-eyed, put their right hands over their hearts, and begin singing
> "The Star-Spangled Banner." And they begin looking for enemies, so they
> can demonstrate their patriotism, a sentiment which will be in fashion
> again for a few months.
> 
> One lemming was arrested in Washington trying to ram his car into the
> Saudi Arabian Embassy. Others around the country have been throwing
> bricks through the windows of mosques. All of them have been flying
> American flags. But among all of them there is hardly a grain of
> understanding. The dimwit who tried to ram the Saudi Arabian Embassy
> doesn't understand that the Saudi government is more afraid of Muslim
> fundamentalists than anyone in the West is. If Muslim fundamentalism
> experiences a surge of growth as a consequence of the success of the
> attacks last week, it will be either the government of Saudi Arabia or
> that of Egypt that will fall first, followed quickly by every other
> Middle Eastern government that has collaborated with the Jews -- or,
> what is the same thing, with America.
> 
> And the chests of all the dimwits swell with pride when their government
> in Washington rattles its sabers and issues demands to the government of
> Pakistan and other governments in the Middle East. Washington has
> demanded cooperation with its effort to catch the people who attacked
> New York and Washington last week. The rulers and top politicians in
> these countries are pledging their cooperation, for their own reasons,
> but this sort of thing doesn't sit well with their countrymen. Patriotic
> Pakistanis, both among the educated classes and among the religious
> elements, can only hate America even more as a result of these
> humiliating demands and the ignominious response of their own leaders.
> 
> Of course, I don't know who organized the attacks on Washington and New
> York last week. Neither does Mr. Bush, and I doubt that he will know
> with any degree of certainty even when he begins ordering missile
> attacks against various Middle Eastern targets, more for proving his
> "leadership" to the flag-waving lemmings here than for actually
> punishing the people who organized the events of last week.
> 
> Aside from these domestic political considerations, the principal
> determinant of the American response will be whatever the Jews think is
> best for Israel. Former Israeli prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu set
> the tone last week while the fire was still burning in the Pentagon and
> in some of the buildings of the World Trade Center complex. He said that
> it will not be enough to kill Osama bin Laden and his followers; the
> United States must destroy all of the governments of those countries
> where terrorist groups might arise in the future. We must do it now,
> Netanyahu demanded, while there is popular support among the American
> people for such a pre-emptive war. If you wait, Netanyahu said, you will
> lose your chance. New and stronger terrorist organizations will spring
> up to take the place of Osama bin Laden's group. So strike now! And
> other Jewish leaders, both in Israel and in the United States, were
> pushing similarly for a full-scale pre-emptive war.
> 
> There's no doubt that the U.S. military forces could depopulate the
> entire Middle East with ease. With minimal loss to ourselves, we could
> make a huge, self-illuminated, glass parking lot out of Pakistan,
> Afghanistan, Iran, and all of the other countries bordering the Persian
> Gulf, the Red Sea, and the eastern Mediterranean -- except Israel, of
> course. Actually, that's not the solution the Jews prefer. Instead they
> want us to send in ground troops, whip their armies, take over their
> countries, and install puppet governments that will follow the Jews'
> orders. Then they can control and milk the whole area. That grinning
> idiot we have in the White House, George Bush, is perfectly willing to
> go along with such a scheme if that's what they tell him to do. The
> media are sampling public opinion now and reporting that most of the
> lemmings will go along too.
> 
> Whether or not that is the way the Bush government goes remains to be
> seen. There are serious liabilities and risks if the United States
> undertakes such a major, protracted war. Occupation armies will be
> required to keep the area pacified. And even though the lemmings are
> feeling all warm and fuzzy and patriotic and morally indignant now in
> the wake of last week's attacks, they may become restless during a
> protracted war intended to bring the whole Middle East under Jewish
> hegemony, especially when our casualties begin mounting. Presumably all
> of these considerations will be taken into account before the Bush
> government is told what to do. Mr. Bush's advisers also should take into
> account what happened to the Soviet Union during its attempt to conquer
> Afghanistan. The Soviet Union spent more than eight years trying to whip
> Afghanistan's Muslim guerrillas and had 15,000 of its own soldiers
> killed in the attempt before finally giving up in 1989. And during this
> attempt the Soviets already had a pro-Soviet government in Kabul: a
> government whose leaders were condemned as traitors and infidels and
> butchered by the Muslims as soon as the Red Army pulled out. Any
> government of Afghanistan that might otherwise be inclined to make a
> deal with the United States certainly will remember that.
> 
> Of course, just because the Soviet Union was unable to whip Afghanistan
> doesn't mean that the United States can't do it -- if the U.S.
> government is willing to make a big enough effort and to sacrifice the
> lives of enough Americans. We certainly have more than enough firepower,
> more than enough high-tech weaponry, to do the job. We are a bit short
> in some departments, to be sure: intelligence, for example. I am
> astounded that as complex an operation as that against the World Trade
> Center and the Pentagon last week could have been planned and carried
> out without the Bush government having any hint of what was going on.
> 
> Was this another Pearl Harbor scenario, where our government knew of an
> impending attack but pretended it knew nothing and waited for the attack
> to come so as to have an excuse for becoming involved in a war? The
> Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, of which the Roosevelt
> government had plenty of forewarning, transformed the sentiment of the
> American public from anti-war to pro-war overnight and allowed the
> Roosevelt government to become fully involved in the war against
> Germany, which was Japan's ally. Roosevelt was itching for a war because
> all the Jews around him were pushing for it. Did the Bush government
> know about last week's attack ahead of time but pretended not to so as
> to have an excuse for launching a war against the Jews' enemies in the
> Middle East? I really don't know. I think it much more likely that the
> government of Israel had some intelligence about the attack ahead of
> time and deliberately withheld that intelligence from the United States.
> That's the sort of thing the Israelis often have done in the past, and
> they certainly welcomed last week's attack.
> 
> Well, that's a minor question. The big question is: Why should we start
> another war now? What advantage do we gain, even if we pulverize
> Afghanistan and kill its entire population? Do we thereby prevent any
> further attacks against America by people in the Middle East who object
> to our government's support of Israel? I think not. Afghanistan is not
> the only country in the Middle East capable of supporting guerrilla
> fighters, and guerrillas who are willing to sacrifice their own lives by
> flying into their targets will not be easily intimidated. We may be able
> to install puppet governments and occupation armies to support those
> governments everywhere in the Middle East, and we may be able to
> introduce all sorts of new security programs in the United States
> intended to make the job of an attacker more difficult, but the ultimate
> cost of all this will be very, very high. And again, the question is,
> why should we do these things? Why should we continue making ourselves a
> target for terrorists so that these things even bear consideration?
> 
> You know, there are Americans who have a chip-on-the-shoulder attitude.
> They don't want to hear that we should stop letting Israel wag America
> like its tail. They don't want to hear that we should stop doing the
> things in the Middle East that make the people of the Middle East
> retaliate against us. Their attitude is, "By God, nobody's going to tell
> us what to do. We'll continue supporting Israel with money, weapons, and
> diplomacy if we want to, whether it's in America's interests or not, and
> if any of those towel-heads in the Middle East don't like it we'll kick
> their asses. We're bigger and tougher than anybody else, and we'll push
> anybody around we want to, and they'd better not complain about it."
> This swaggering, bully-boy attitude is what we're hearing from some
> American politicians now who're courting Jewish support -- and also from
> some military leaders with political ambitions, unfortunately.
> 
> I think that's really stupid. Let's let the attacks on New York and
> Washington last week serve as a wake-up call for every thinking
> American: a wake-up call for us to begin paying attention to our
> government's policies and to begin insisting that our government act
> only to protect and promote the interests of the American people, and
> nothing else. For far too long we have watched cynically from the
> sidelines as our government became more and more corrupt, more and more
> irresponsible, more and more negligent of America's interests. We
> watched the Jews corrupt our political system with their money and their
> media and then use America's power and wealth for their own purposes.
> Most Americans, because of the Jewish control of their mass media, are
> not aware of this, but thinking people in most of the rest of the world
> certainly are aware of the way we're being used. This has earned America
> the contempt of the whole world, including not only Israel's enemies,
> but Israel itself. The deliberate Israeli attempt to sink our ship the
> USS Liberty in 1967 was just one indicator of that contempt, which has
> grown more profound since.
> 
> You know, there are two reasons why the people of the Middle East hate
> America. One reason is that to the Muslims America is the Great Satan,
> the corrupter of the world. They don't want us meddling in their affairs
> and trying to change the ideas and attitudes of their people. They don't
> want our Hollywood films and our Madison Avenue fashions and our
> immorality and our lust for money to corrupt their people. They don't
> want to be contaminated by us. They want us to take all of our Jewish
> fashions and our Jewish television and our Jewish attitudes and ideas
> and get out of their lives, go home, leave them alone. For many Muslims
> the view of America as the Great Satan, the great corrupter, as an
> actual source of corruption in the Middle East, is enough reason to
> attack us.
> 
> But if we were not meddling in their affairs, if we were not supporting
> puppet governments in their part of the world, if we were not supporting
> Israel, if we were not bringing our corruption to them, if we would in
> fact go home and leave them alone, their contempt for our lack of
> character and morality would not be a sufficient motive for them to
> attack us over here. The reason for their attack last week is our
> support for Israel's aggression against them. Our lying media and our
> lying politicians in Washington will deny that, but it is crystal clear
> to anyone with eyes to see; it is obvious to thinking people everywhere.
> The attack last week was not "unprovoked." We were attacked because we
> support Israel financially, diplomatically, and militarily. As long as
> we continue to support Israel we will remain a target for the patriots
> and the religious fundamentalists of every other country in the Middle
> East. Is that really what we want to do? Does that really serve
> America's interests?
> 
> I think not. Let's emphasize just two things in connection with last
> week's attack. First, anybody in the media or in the government, any
> politician or other public figure, who tells us that the attack was
> "unprovoked" is lying to us: consciously and deliberately lying, because
> although the lemmings may not know any better, every government official
> and every media boss does know better. And anyone who deliberately lies
> to the American people on such an important matter is thereby declaring
> himself an enemy of America, an enemy of the American people, whether
> the liar is George Bush or a top media Jew or a general in the Pentagon.
> Anyone who tries to steer us away from the truth that this attack was a
> retaliation for the American support of Israel's atrocious behavior in
> the Middle East is an enemy of America.
> 
> Second, when we hear media spokesmen or government spokesmen tell us
> sternly, their voices quivering with phony indignation, that we need to
> hunt down and punish the evil men responsible for last week's attack, we
> can only agree with them. Yes, the people responsible for the attack are
> evil and should be hunted down and punished. But we don't have to go to
> the Middle East to find the responsible people and punish them. They're
> a lot closer than the Middle East. They're evil, but not because a lot
> of Jewish real estate in New York was destroyed; yes, that's right, the
> owner of the World Trade Center -- that is, the owner of a 99-year lease
> on the property -- is a Jew, Larry Silverstein. They're evil, but not
> because a great many Jewish lawyers and Jewish financial consultants and
> Jewish middlemen had offices in the World Trade Center. They're evil
> because thousands of young White women who worked as receptionists and
> secretaries and file clerks in both the World Trade Center and the
> Pentagon were killed, along with hundreds of airline passengers and crew
> members. That is what calls for punishment.
> 
> And who are the evil men who should be punished, these men responsible
> for the death of so many of our people? Mr. Bush assures us that he's
> got the FBI and the CIA on their tails, and that he'll find them pretty
> soon. Hey! Mr. Bush! Call off the FBI and the CIA. If you want to know
> who's responsible, just walk into your bathroom and look in the mirror.
> Of course, it's not really fair to put all of the blame on Mr. Bush. His
> last ten or so predecessors in the White House also are responsible.
> Republican and Democrat alike, they've all danced to whatever tune
> Israel was playing. By ignoring America's interests and letting
> themselves be used by Israel against Israel's neighbors for the past
> half century, they all helped to incur the debt that was only partly
> repaid last week.
> 
> And indeed, we can cast the net of blame much wider. We have a system of
> government in the United States that the Jews have learned to
> manipulate. With their money and their media they are able to swing
> elections, buy politicians, and control public policy to suit
> themselves, without regard for the interests of the American people.
> After the Second World War they were determined to change American
> immigration policy in a way that would dilute the White majority with a
> flood of non-White immigrants, and they found a multitude of White
> politicians and White clerics and White businessmen willing to
> collaborate with them and push through the immigration changes they
> wanted. And when the Jews launched the so-called "civil rights"
> revolution in the 1960s, again they found many thousands of White
> politicians and clerics and businessmen and lawyers to help them strike
> down the laws against miscegenation and push through new legislation
> requiring the racial integration of schools and workplaces and
> neighborhoods.
> 
> And the same pattern can be seen in the entire history of America's
> policy in the Middle East. From the beginning it has been a policy
> intended to promote Jewish interests and to sacrifice American
> interests, but the Jews could not have pushed these policies through by
> themselves. They had a multitude of Gentile collaborators willing to
> sacrifice the interests of the American people in order to curry favor
> with the Jews. And these people, these traitors to their country and to
> their race, who put their own selfish interests above those of their
> people, certainly have been aware all along of the debt that was being
> built up. Sally Soccer Mom and Joe Six Pack may not have figured out why
> everyone in the Muslim world hates America's guts and why a few Muslims
> are willing to die in order to punish America for what America has done
> to them on behalf of Israel, but the traitors understand it perfectly
> well. They understand who is responsible for last week's tragedy, and
> that's why they all try to keep the public confused by always referring
> to last week's attack as "unprovoked." And I'll guarantee you this:
> America will continue to have tragedy after tragedy, not because we
> don't have strict enough security measures at our airports, and not
> because of Osama bin Laden, but because we don't have a government which
> represents the interests of the American people. Until we regain control
> of our own news and entertainment media and have leaders whose sole
> concern is what's good for America -- not what will win them Jewish
> support in the next election -- we'll remain a nation adrift, hated by
> all, respected by none, and fair game for anyone who has a grievance
> against us.
> 
> Thanks for being with me again today.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
> Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
> It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.
> 
> To subscribe to ADVlist send an e-mail message to:
> ADVlist-on@NatVan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
> matter.)
> 
> For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
> National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
> http://www.natall.com
> 
> ==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy.  This
> information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
> indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.
> 
> To contact us, write to:
>      National Vanguard Books
>      Attention:  ADVlist
>      P.O. Box 330
>      Hillsboro, WV  24946
> 
> or e-mail:  national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
> comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
> given.
> 
> ==>  TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to:
> ADVlist-off@NatVan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
> matter.)
> 
> (c) 2001 National Vanguard Books

Fine article.

Phil