Article View: mn.general
Article #7Re: Ethanol blended gasoline
From: Bob Hain (Sysop)
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 02:17
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 02:17
45 lines
2800 bytes
2800 bytes
In article <1992Oct28.191546.17983@news2.cis.umn.edu> molenda@i1.msi.umn.edu (Jason Molenda) writes: >n3022@cray.com writes: > >> Has the media been talking about this inclusion of ethanol in all >> gasoline lately and I have just missed it, or is this being quietly >> sprung on us all? > >I had heard of it a few weeks ago. I think the majority of the folks >won't know/care about the difference. Motor vehicle manufacturers had >been advising against using ethanol and such fuels for a while, but >have recently pulled their warnings. I'm not usually one to subscribe When gasoline/ethanol belends first came on the market many car manufactures advised against its use. This was primarily because many of the fuel system componnents would deteriorate when exposed to alchol. Since then manufactures have replaced the components with newer materials that resist alchol. You should be able to run most newer cars on a 10% blend without worry. >to conspriacy-theorists' ideas, but the revoking coincided roughly with >the recent mandation of ethanol and related fuels in a couple of >eastern states, if I understand correctly. > >> If I understand the article right as a car owner and gasoline user I >> now have no choice but to use ethanol blended gasoline. If ethanol >> blend affects my cars operation adversely that's too bad for me. You can expect to get slightly less fuel economy with gasohol. Alchol gives off less heat than an equal amount of gasoline. The main idea behind using alchol blended fuel is that the oxygen atoms in the alchol will help to reduce emissions. Because a few cars (10-20%) produce most (70-90%) of the pollution, this is policy that has very little effect. > >Yep. The article went on to say that it would be (I believe) >state-wide in '95 and nation-wide in '97. I'm sure someone will >correct me if I'm remembering wrong. Of course, it said this was only >in effect for the ``metro-area''. I would recommend riding to Red Wing >to get gas. It's a really pretty area and well worth the trip anyway. >:-) > >>Anyone else have any insight on this issue?? bob hain bob@ht2.me.umn.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct29.021713.24085@news2.cis.umn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!gatech!udel!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!ht2.me.umn.edu!bobReferences:
<1992Oct28.085133.2456@hemlock.cray.com> <1992Oct28.191546.17983@news2.cis.umn.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: mn.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!gatech!udel!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!ht2.me.umn.edu!bob From: bob@ht2.me.umn.edu (Bob Hain (Sysop)) Subject: Re: Ethanol blended gasoline Message-ID: <1992Oct29.021713.24085@news2.cis.umn.edu> Keywords: ethanol Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: ht2.me.umn.edu Organization: Dept. Mechanical Engineering, Univeristy of Minnesota References: <1992Oct28.085133.2456@hemlock.cray.com> <1992Oct28.191546.17983@news2.cis.umn.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 02:17:13 GMT Lines: 46