Re: Common Lisp for Amiga? Slip?

Article View: mod.amiga

Article #53

#53

From: ee173way
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1987 04:19

17 lines
1318 bytes

Metacomco Cambridge Lisp 68000 for the Amiga isn't all that bad-
if you know Lisp.  When I first purchased Lisp, I too thought it
was a piece of trash, but as I learned Lisp, the poor documentation,
nonexistant features, etc were less of a problem.  You can write
your own routines (like LET and DO) very easily once you have
mastered Lisp.  I have used Amiga Lisp in an AI class and Lisp class
and it performed quite well.  With 1 mbyte memory large programs are
no problem...
  
The only other Lisp for the Amiga currently is a Public Domain
Lisp, XLisp, written in C, and I think it may include source.

Hello Gold Hill? Texas Instruments?  Port to Amiga...


  John
  7OHN

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3699@sdcc3.ucsd.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!wanginst!ulowell!sdcc3.ucsd.EDU!ee173way

References: <949@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!wanginst!ulowell!sdcc3.ucsd.EDU!ee173way
From: ee173way@sdcc3.ucsd.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.amiga
Subject: Re: Common Lisp for Amiga? Slip?
Message-ID: <3699@sdcc3.ucsd.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19-Jan-87 23:19:10 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc3.3699
Posted: Mon Jan 19 23:19:10 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Jan-87 19:37:43 EST
References: <949@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu>
Sender: page@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu
Reply-To: ee173way@sdcc3.ucsd.edu.UUCP (John Schultz)
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 17
Approved: page@ulowell.UUCP

Reply to Parent Message