Article View: mod.comp-soc
Article #309Re: 'sensitive' information
From: taylor
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1987 02:56
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1987 02:56
35 lines
2645 bytes
2645 bytes
[through a number of hops...]
THE THREAT OF GOVERNMENT CONTROLS ON ELECTRONIC DATABASES
that contain "sensitive but unclassified information" has receded, at
least temporarily (WN 27 Feb 87). In a stunning reversal of policy,
Frank Carlucci, the new National Security Advisor to the President,
announced in a conciliatory letter to Rep. Jack Brooks (D-TX), Chairman
of the Government Operations Committee, that NTISSP-2, the notorious
"Poindexter Memorandum," was being rescinded. It was this directive
that defined "sensitive but unclassified information" as information
affecting "national security or other Federal Government interests," a
definition that could fit a giraffe. Carlucci also said that NSDD 145,
National Policy on Telecommunications and Automated Information Systems
Security, which in Brook's words created a "shadow government," was being
reviewed. The reversal is attributable to the solid opposition of groups
such as the library associations and scientific societies.
Although Carlucci declined to testify on grounds of executive
privilege, he refused to extend that protection to Poindexter. showed up before
the Committee on Tuesday, but confined himself to puffing on his pipe taking
the Fifth. Secretary of Commerce Baldrige and Deputy Secretary of Defense Taft
testified that responsibility for computer security should be moved to a
civilian agency.
Perhaps the most significant testimony on Tuesday came at the end,
after most of the press had left to file their stories. Harold Relyea of the
Library of Congress discussed the whole phenomenon of National Security
Decision Directives (NSDD's). Out of some 200 NSDD's, all but five are secret,
and are not generally available even to Congress. They have apparently been
used to authorize such things as the disinformation campaign against Libya and
$50M for Argentina to train Contras. He said they bring us very close to the
most dangerous practice of totalitarian government -- rule by secret law.
- -
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1474@hplabsc.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!hplabsc!taylorReferences:
<1340@hplabsc.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!hplabsc!taylor From: taylor@hplabsc.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.comp-soc Subject: Re: 'sensitive' information Message-ID: <1474@hplabsc.HP.COM> Date: Mon, 23-Mar-87 21:56:19 EST Article-I.D.: hplabsc.1474 Posted: Mon Mar 23 21:56:19 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 25-Mar-87 05:54:56 EST References: <1340@hplabsc.HP.COM> Sender: taylor@hplabsc.HP.COM Distribution: world Organization: McDonnell-Douglas, APD-ASD Lines: 35 Approved: taylor@hplabs