Re: 68000 O/S's, MMUs, et. al.

Article View: mod.computers.68k

Article #166

#166

From: jon
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1987 20:28

20 lines
1435 bytes

Robert Heller writes:
>First of I don't object to having a MMU.  It is just that I don't think a
>MMU is *neccessary* for *most* applications.  In a development/hacker
>environment and with real milti-user systems it is needed.  It is doubtfull
>that MMUs will ever be common on *little* home/office systems (i.e. ST's,
>Amiga's, Mac's etc.)

The i286 (IBM-AT) and i386 (Compaq 386) already include on chip MMU's.
So does the Mot 68030.  Other manufacturers will soon follow.
"Anything that can be put on silicon will eventually cost a dollar." -
Noyce.  Many home systems already include an MMU, and the rest will
soon follow.

  Jonathan Ryshpan   MS D3645	    USENET: ...hplabs!nsc!blit!jon
  National Semiconductor	    ARPA:   decwrl!nsc!blit!jon@ucbvax.arpa
  2900 Semiconductor Dr.	    DOMAIN: jon@blit.sc.nsc.com
  P.O. Box 58090
  Sunnyvale, CA  95052-8090	    PHONE:  408-721-5481

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8702182028.AA23948@nsc.NSC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!blit.UUCP!jon

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!blit.UUCP!jon
From: jon@blit.UUCP.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.computers.68k
Subject: Re: 68000 O/S's, MMUs, et. al.
Message-ID: <8702182028.AA23948@nsc.NSC.COM>
Date: Wed, 18-Feb-87 15:28:15 EST
Article-I.D.: nsc.8702182028.AA23948
Posted: Wed Feb 18 15:28:15 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Feb-87 21:36:15 EST
Sender: mwm@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 20
Approved: info-68k@ucbvax.berkeley.edu