🚀 go-pugleaf

It appear that may data about the behavior of
info-68k/mod.computers.68k was wrong. Everything is working exactly as
I wish it. The duplicate posting were in error. My apologies to all.

On the other hand, I recieved one note from a usenet reader asking me
not to crosspost comp.sys.m68k to info-68k. Since info-68k is an
ARPANet mail list, some of the readers (most notably those on BITNET)
may not have a chance to see comp.sys.m68k. As a service to them, I
will continue to forward pertinent articles to info-68k. This means
that those of you reading on netnews may have to read them twice.

As an alternative, I could arrange to gateway all info-68k to/from
comp.sys.m68k, and do away with mod.computers.68k. The last time this
was suggested, the readers of info-68k (who have the ultimate say)
either didn't care, or wished that it not happen. Does anyone out
there feel strongly about this one way or another?

	ucbvax!mwm
	mwm@berkeley.edu
	mwm@ucbjade.BITNET
	<mike