??new format??

Article View: mod.computers.vax

Article #3771

#3771

From: EDDIE
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1987 06:47

25 lines
1498 bytes

Hi All,

Reality Check.  I thought the *new format* for INFO-VAX was just a temp.
measure because there was a serious backlog of INFO-VAX messages waiting to
be sent to subscribers.

What I see is that people who subscribe to this list are thinking that the
*new format* is something to be debated.

My two cents worth:  I break up all the mail that I receive into folders.
If the the INFO-VAX listserver manager digests all of the messages and sends
them out as one message, then I either have to do a lot of editing to put them
into folders, or I make my employees subscribe to INFO-VAX so that they
can do it for me.  In essence, the "digest" form of this listserver causes
me great pains.

The "old way" of sending messages is better for me.

Ed Bibisi
Manager Networking/Data Communications
Department of Computer Science
University of Tennessee, Memphis

ebibisi@@utmem1.bitnet

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8703151544.AA03327@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!im4u!rutgers!lll-lcc!ptsfa!dual!ucbvax!UTMEM1.BITNET!EBIBISI

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!im4u!rutgers!lll-lcc!ptsfa!dual!ucbvax!UTMEM1.BITNET!EBIBISI
From: EBIBISI@UTMEM1.BITNET (EDDIE)
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: ??new format??
Message-ID: <8703151544.AA03327@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Sun, 15-Mar-87 01:47:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8703151544.AA03327
Posted: Sun Mar 15 01:47:00 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 16-Mar-87 03:59:51 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 25
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa