🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: mod.computers.vax
Article #3972

DECnet-RSX vs. segmented routing update messages

#3972
From: GKN
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1987 00:43
18 lines
1194 bytes
[I realize this is the wrong forum for this ...]

Does anybody out there know of a bug in DECnet-RSX which prevents it from
properly handling segmented routing update messages?  I have reason to
believe that this is what's going on here, and am thinking about increasing
the segment buffer size as a workaround.

gkn
--------------------------------------
Arpa:	GKN@SDSC.ARPA
Bitnet:	GKN@SDSC
Span:	SDSC::GKN (27.1)	<--- New address!!
USPS:	Gerard K. Newman
	San Diego Supercomputer Center
	P.O. Box 85608
	San Diego, CA 92138
AT&T:	619.534.5076
-------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8703281310.AA25796@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!SDSC-SDS.ARPA!GKN

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!SDSC-SDS.ARPA!GKN
From: GKN@SDSC-SDS.ARPA.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: DECnet-RSX vs. segmented routing update messages
Message-ID: <8703281310.AA25796@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Fri, 27-Mar-87 19:43:34 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8703281310.AA25796
Posted: Fri Mar 27 19:43:34 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Mar-87 09:13:03 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: San Diego Supercomputer Center
Lines: 18
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa