Re: Masscomp

Article View: mod.computers.workstations

Article #22

Back to mod.computers.workstations Previous Next

#22

From: works
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 1985 17:58

9 lines
1195 bytes

We at KAI have been using MassComps for over 2 years now. While at
first we have had a lot a problems with reliability, I believe the
machines have become more stable. They are very nice to use as
workstations, though we don't tend to do too much of that around
here. My only complaint is that the documentation isn't always
accurate and every software quality report I submit gets answered
with "Haven't been able to duplicate that."

As an aside, I found Mr. Walls' response to his criticisms quite juvenile.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8512071758.AA17576@seismo.CSS.GOV>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!works

References: <8512041208.AA24490@caip.rutgers.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!works
From: works@ucbvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.computers.workstations
Subject: Re: Masscomp
Message-ID: <8512071758.AA17576@seismo.CSS.GOV>
Date: Sat, 7-Dec-85 12:58:23 EST
Article-I.D.: seismo.8512071758.AA17576
Posted: Sat Dec  7 12:58:23 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Dec-85 21:42:10 EST
References: <8512041208.AA24490@caip.rutgers.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: Kurzweil A.I. Waltham, Mass.
Lines: 10
Approved: works@red.rutgers.edu
Summary: Our experiences with MC-500's

Reply to Parent Message