Thread View: mod.computers.workstations
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by cel
Mon, 23 Feb 1987 15:40
ISI workstations
Author: cel
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1987 15:40
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1987 15:40
15 lines
1255 bytes
1255 bytes
I could benefit from someone's experience with the ISI workstations,
either the Optimum V (16 MHz) or the Series 400 (25 MHz). I'm
interested in any comments you may have, but particularly in
reliability (hardward AND software), level of technical support,
actual (as opposed to claimed) adherence to standards (such as VME
bus, UNIX bsd4.2, Ethernet, ...). I'm particularly interested in how
close they come to being functionally equivalent to the SUN 3/280
system. Please reply on netnews under this category (workstations)
or send e-mail to:
Curtis Lacy
Applied Physics Laboratory
University of Washington
{allegra,microvax,decvax,ucbvax!lbl-csam}!uw-beaver!uw-apl!cel
Re: ISI workstations
Author: barnett
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1987 15:25
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1987 15:25
51 lines
3248 bytes
3248 bytes
In article <147@uw-apl.UUCP> cel@uw-apl.UUCP (Curtis Lacy) writes:
>
>I could benefit from someone's experience with the ISI workstations,
>either the Optimum V (16 MHz) or the Series 400 (25 MHz). I'm
>interested in any comments you may have, but particularly in
>reliability (hardward AND software), level of technical support,
>
>Curtis Lacy
>Applied Physics Laboratory
>University of Washington
>{allegra,microvax,decvax,ucbvax!lbl-csam}!uw-beaver!uw-apl!cel
I'm currently writing some software for the Integrated Solutions
Optimum V8 Workstation, and I have a few observations to offer.
The code I'm writing makes frequent use of the ISI "toolbox" library
for things like form menus (a mechanism for gathering user input
which is similar to, but not as general as, Macintosh dialogue boxes)
and button fields. The tools library isn't bullet-proof. But
they're working on it. The technical support has been very good so
far -- I've notified them of the bugs I've found and gotten
workarounds for some, and assurances that others will be taken care
of in the next release. The problem here seems to be that there just
haven't been that many people doing programming of this sort on the
station as yet.
As far as the environment itself goes, it's pretty nice. It's a
curious but fairly effective mix of the Macintosh and SunWindows
environments. The only application software I've had any trouble
with is a program that informs the shell that you're using a non-
standard window size. If you turn a window into a graphics window,
then back into a tty, things get confused. (But this is also an
artifact of my programming activity.) The one thing I really wish
they'd done differently is the mouse -- it's mechanical, not optical.
I guess my final (for the moment) evaluation of the software is that
it isn't quite a mature windowing system, from the programmer's point
of view -- from the application oriented user's point of view it's
fine, and has some quite nice features -- the desktop stack comes
immediately to mind here. (You're allowed to have multiple
'desktops,' each of which has a user definable appearance and set of
program/document icons.)
If anyone else out there is hacking on one of these stations, I'd be
pleased to hear from you to swap tales!
Lewis Barnett,CS Dept, Taylor Hall 2.124, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712
-- barnett@im4u.UTEXAS.EDU, barnett@im4u.UUCP,
{ihnp4,harvard,seismo,gatech,ctvax}!im4u!barnett
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads