Thread View: mod.os
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by darrell
Sat, 14 Feb 1987 12:15
Re: Why no "real" distributed systems?
Author: darrell
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1987 12:15
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1987 12:15
28 lines
2313 bytes
2313 bytes
What about Apollo's OS (don't know its name)? What about Stanford's
V system? I've never used either one, but from what I've read they
both seem to be truly distributed. One could also argue that the VAX/VMS
cluster facility also represents a distributed OS - it provides a truly
transparently distributed file system.
[ I would argue that calling Apollo's Domain a "distributed system" ]
[ would be close to calling 4.3BSD a "distributed system." I must ]
[ confess that I do not have an Apollo on which to base this -- ]
[ it's just folk-lore. ]
[ ]
[ As for the V-System, I would call that a "distributed system," ]
[ but it is an extremely experimental system from what I can gather ]
[ from the papers. From what I have heard from folks who have used ]
[ it, there is little or no protection for data. ]
[ ]
[ In summary, when I asked "Why are there no `real' distributed ]
[ systems?", I was asking why aren't any commercially available? ]
[ It is interesting that this discussion has evolved into the very ]
[ appropriate question: "What is a distributed system anyhow?" ]
[ ]
[ --DL darrell@beowulf.ucsd.edu ]
--
Larry Campbell The Boston Software Works, Inc.
Internet: campbell@maynard.uucp 120 Fulton Street, Boston MA 02109
uucp: {alliant,wjh12}!maynard!campbell +1 617 367 6846
ARPA: campbell%maynard.uucp@harvisr.harvard.edu MCI: LCAMPBELL
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads