🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by darrell Wed, 25 Feb 1987 17:07
Re: Why no "real" distributed systems?
#76
Author: darrell
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1987 17:07
28 lines
1826 bytes
In article <2721@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> darrell@sdcsvax.UUCP writes:
>[ In summary, when I asked "Why are  there  no  `real'  distributed ]
>[ systems?",  I  was  asking why aren't any commercially available? ]
>[ .... ]
>[ --DL  darrell@beowulf.ucsd.edu                                    ]

The LOCUS operating system appears to be a true distributed system, running
across heterogeneous cpu's. Unfortunately, it is also vaporware, as they
have not released it, and don't seem to be planning to any time real soon.

(To be fair, part of the problem seems to be that they want to track both
BSD and S5, and apparently by the time they get LOCUS up to compatibility
with one version of {BSD, S5}, {UCB, ATT} goes and releases the next one!
From what I understand, the initial version(s) of LOCUS were based on 4.1BSD.)

Non-flaming rebuttals from someone at LOCUS are welcome.
-- 
Arnold Robbins
CSNET:	arnold@emory	BITNET:	arnold@emoryu1
ARPA:	arnold%emory.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
UUCP:	{ akgua, decvax, gatech, sb1, sb6, sunatl }!emory!arnold


-- 
Darrell Long
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla CA 92093
ARPA: Darrell@Beowulf.UCSD.EDU  UUCP: darrell@sdcsvax.uucp
Operating Systems submissions to: mod-os@sdcsvax.uucp
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads