Article View: mod.protocols
Article #41Re: Re: RING vs. ETHER - Theory and practice
From: Jay Warrior
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1986 12:01
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1986 12:01
36 lines
2337 bytes
2337 bytes
> > > Mark, > > Re : 802.2 Type 2 operation > > 802.2 offers you Type 1 or Type 2 operation. Type 1 is pure datagram stuff with > the ARPANET's "take your chance" approach while Type 2 goes the other extreme > and do both flow control and error recovery. > > The general idea is that if you are going for a heavy weight Tranpsort Layer > already such as TCP or TP-4, you should leave every thing to that layer and > chose Type 1. If you are going to use light weight Tranpsort layer such as TP-0, > then Type 2 is for you. (Interestingly, IBM is using Type 2 since under SNA, > the link layer is the only level that will do error recovery). > > Hence unless we can get IEEE802.2 to create a Type 1.5, we don't think it is > worth our while to spend the cycles required for Type 2. (Actually, having a > Type 1.5 that will do low level acknowlegement but without flow control and > error recovery procedure may be quite useful - particularly for network level > gateway machines). > > Leong Your type "1.5" service is a proposed addendum to 802.2, called acknowledged connectionless service. This service, actually called Type 3 service is a "send one frame, receive one acknowledgement" service. If you are interested in the details, the service is specified in ISA-S72.01-1985, the PROWAY Industrial Data Highway standard from the Instrument Society of America. The goal was to provide for reliable data transfer without the overhead of a connection oriented service for real time, process control networks. This service works best over a 802.4 token bus by the way,the "real time extentions" in that standard are meant to support this service. --jay ihnp4!rosevax!jay
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8607241201.AA17734@rosevax.ROSENET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!rosevax.UUCP!jayReferences:
<MS.leong.0.leong.139.5@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!rosevax.UUCP!jay From: jay@rosevax.UUCP (Jay Warrior) Newsgroups: mod.protocols Subject: Re: Re: RING vs. ETHER - Theory and practice Message-ID: <8607241201.AA17734@rosevax.ROSENET> Date: Thu, 24-Jul-86 08:01:28 EDT Article-I.D.: rosevax.8607241201.AA17734 Posted: Thu Jul 24 08:01:28 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Jul-86 06:39:06 EDT References: <MS.leong.0.leong.139.5@andrew.cmu.edu> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 36 Approved: protocols@red.rutgers.edu