Has this failed mail got to stop?

Article View: mod.protocols

Article #53

#53

From: W8SDZ
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1986 04:15

9 lines
980 bytes

I don't condone the reaction of John Gilmore.  What I do wonder,
though, is why DoD hasn't ORDERED that this failed mail situation be
fixed because of the vast amount of net resources used in sending
advisory and failed notices.  It sometimes takes so much of the
resources here at Simtel20 as to stop all network terminal output for
30-45 seconds at a time during the period when the mailer is sending
those.

--Keith

Technical Details

Message-ID: <KPETERSEN.12231685632.BABYL@SIMTEL20.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!SIMTEL20.ARPA!W8SDZ

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!SIMTEL20.ARPA!W8SDZ
From: W8SDZ@SIMTEL20.ARPA.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.protocols
Subject: Has this failed mail got to stop?
Message-ID: <KPETERSEN.12231685632.BABYL@SIMTEL20.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 18-Aug-86 00:15:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: SIMTEL20.KPETERSEN.12231685632.BABYL
Posted: Mon Aug 18 00:15:00 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Aug-86 23:14:41 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 9
Approved: protocols@red.rutgers.edu