🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by adam Thu, 05 Mar 1987 17:05
(none)
#101
Author: adam
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1987 17:05
26 lines
1681 bytes
Newsgroups: comp.protocols
Subject: Re: Numbering Plans
References: <8702251951.AA00974@rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: adam@its63b.ed.ac.uk (ERCF02 Adam Hamilton)
Distribution: world
Organization: I.T. School, Univ. of Edinburgh, U.K.

In article <8702251951.AA00974@rutgers.edu> sullivan@EDN-VAX.ARPA (Pat Sullivan) writes:
>
>Has anyone out there done any thinking about numbering plan
>strategies which would eventually reconcile different addressing
>schemes, such as voice (E.163), ISDN (E.164), data (1822, X.121,
>IP) and eventually lead to a uniform addressing standard?
> .............
>Thanks,
>Pat Sullivan
>Defense Communications Engineering Center
>Reston, VA.

ISO 8348 on the Network Service definition has a Draft Addendum 2 on
Network Layer Addressing.  This proposes a scheme for globally unique
NSAPs which includes X.121, E.163, E.164, F.69 (Telex) and a couple of
others as subsets.  There is (currently) no provision for 1822 or IP.
This document is a must if you want to know what ISO thinks is right
for a global addressing scheme.
				Adam Hamilton
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads