🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by mod-psi Wed, 21 Jan 1987 20:09
Re: PSI vs scienterrific research vs wi
#27
Author: mod-psi
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1987 20:09
55 lines
2922 bytes
[]

>/* Written  9:25 am  Jan 12, 1987 by mod-psi@ulowell.UUCP in inmet:mod.psi */
>/* ---------- "Re: PSI vs scienterrific research vs wi" ---------- */
>>
>>   Why hasn't science been brought to bear succesfully on psi? Elementary. 
>> Proper investigation of psi could take lifetimes. Your typical scientist (who
>>has to eat, too) isn't willing to risk his credibility and career on something
>> that far out in left field. 

Tosh!  Mapping human DNA will probably take lifetimes.  Filling in the 
holes of the periodic table took lifetimes.  The search for 
extra-terrestrial intelligence will take lifetimes (but gets some
funding, last I heard).

>>Why is it so far out? Because scientists are all
>> believed to be hopeless Mundanes (the term used by my Gifted friends) who
>> couldn't understand spiritual matters if they tried. The blade cuts both ways

False symmetry.  What about Susan Blackmore?

>> Sunny.
>
>I am a scientist.  (Does B.S. Engineering count as scientist?)

I don't know.  If you are engaged in *science* you are a scientist.
That is, you do well-designed experiments which can be duplicated by
others.  I certainly hope that you aren't implying that because you
had an engineering education, your later actions or beliefs are
"scientific".

>I am a psychic healer, and will attain my Reverend title in March.

Congratulations (I mean it!) but...

>	Psychic phenomena DOES bear up to the scientific method.

Oh?  $10,000 (and a great deal of media hype) is yours if you can
demonstrate this to James Randi (you will notice that demonstration to
outside observers is *part* of the scientific method, so if you cannot
do this, then *these* psychic phenomena do NOT fall into the category of
science).

If, by the way, you *would* call Randi, except that you *think*
he is biased and close-minded, then you are not being scientific:
why not call him and find out?

>I have repeatedly seen spiritual (psychic) healing techniques work in a 
>repeatable manner.  ANYONE who WANTS to find evidence of PSI phenomena, 
>can go to the Berkeley Psychic Institute ministry of the Church of 
>Divine Man, and see such.  You want to believe there is no evidence, 
>don't go there.

So send a representative to pick up James Randi and show him the error
of his ways.  AFTER that, make the assertion.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads