Article View: mod.std.unix
Article #114Re: command line arguments
From: John Quarterman
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1985 19:56
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1985 19:56
30 lines
1654 bytes
1654 bytes
From: utastro!nather (Ed Nather)
> Frank da Cruz's new C-Kermit adopts a set of command line argument
> standards that are worth looking at.
> [...]
> A group of bundled options may end with an option that has an argument.
This creates confusion in using C-Kermit when you want to send an image
file. For example:
send -is filename < --- works fine
send -si filename < --- bombs the program
I personally find it hard to remember which is which, since they both seem
equally sensible to me. I would *much* prefer to bundle the flags, then
have those with arguments pick them up in the same order as the flags are
listed. In the above case, the "-i" flag doesn't take an argument, so I
think it should be processed but should not "shield" the "-s" flag from its
argument.
But what do I know?
Ed Nather
Astronomy Dept, U of Texas @ Austin
{allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!nather
nather%utastro.UTEXAS@ut-sally.ARPA
--
John Quarterman, jsq@ut-sally.ARPA, {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!jsq
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2244@ut-sally.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!dual!mordor!ut-sally!jsqReferences:
<2210@ut-sally.UUCP> <2226@ut-sally.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-sally.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!dual!mordor!ut-sally!jsq From: jsq@ut-sally.UUCP (John Quarterman) Newsgroups: mod.std.unix Subject: Re: command line arguments Message-ID: <2244@ut-sally.UUCP> Date: Tue, 2-Jul-85 15:56:12 EDT Article-I.D.: ut-sally.2244 Posted: Tue Jul 2 15:56:12 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 3-Jul-85 18:46:49 EDT References: <2210@ut-sally.UUCP> <2226@ut-sally.UUCP> Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 30 Approved: jsq@ut-sally.UUCP