Equal access for non-Bell areas

Article View: mod.telecom

Article #270

#270

From: "Christopher A. Kent"
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1986 05:22

18 lines
1396 bytes

I have the distinct displeasure of living in an area served by GTE. At
the moment, I have no choice about my long distance carrier; it's AT&T.
Even so, I apparently can't take part in any of AT&T's premiums,
because I'm not a direct customer.

I have an account with Sprint, but they don't have a local access
point. (Some noise about abuse of accounts in a college town.) 950
service seems to be unheard of.

What I'm wondering is what requirements have been placed on operating
companies that *weren't* part of the Bell System before the Breakup, as
far as equal access goes? I don't expect to be here much longer, but
I'm curious if the folks in West Lafayette, IN, can ever expect to be
able to choose their favorite LD carrier?

Cheers,
chris
----------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8602050704.AA06116@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!telecom

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!telecom
From: cak@PURDUE.EDU ("Christopher A. Kent")
Newsgroups: mod.telecom
Subject: Equal access for non-Bell areas
Message-ID: <8602050704.AA06116@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 4-Feb-86 00:22:48 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8602050704.AA06116
Posted: Tue Feb  4 00:22:48 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Feb-86 21:04:54 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 18
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu