Article View: mod.telecom
Article #415Charges for Unlisted Service
From: Arthur_Axelrod.WBST128
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1986 20:38
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1986 20:38
12 lines
1068 bytes
1068 bytes
" Southern Bell doesn't charge for unlisted numbers if you also have a listed number. (This is logical considering why they have a charge for unlisted numbers.) --henry schaffer n c state univ" Why does the TelCo have a charge for unlisted numbers? I've never really understood that. Why is it logical to not charge for unlisting one if you have another that is listed? Art Axelrod Xerox Webster Research Center
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8608102058.AA09083@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!XEROX.COM!"Arthur_Axelrod.WBST128"Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!XEROX.COM!"Arthur_Axelrod.WBST128" From: "Arthur_Axelrod.WBST128"@XEROX.COM Newsgroups: mod.telecom Subject: Charges for Unlisted Service Message-ID: <8608102058.AA09083@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 4-Aug-86 16:38:30 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8608102058.AA09083 Posted: Mon Aug 4 16:38:30 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Aug-86 23:42:55 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 13 Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu