Article View: mod.unix
Article #16Unix Technical Discussions V1 #7
From: unix
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1985 18:29
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1985 18:29
78 lines
3664 bytes
3664 bytes
From: Ron Heiby (The Moderator) <unix-request@cbosgd.UUCP>
Unix Technical Discussions Sat, 09 Mar 1985 Volume 1 : Issue 7
Today's topics:
Want Symbolic Debug for BSD2.9
Need Help with BSD2.9 dump/restor
Want to put BSD2.9 on PDP-11/24
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 19 Feb 85 20:57:59 GMT
From: jwp@uwmacc.UUCP (jeffrey w percival)
Subject: symbolic debugger for 2.9
Under version 2.8, cc has a -g (debug) option that is supposed
to provide additional symbol table information for use by a
symbolic debugger named sdb. We have 2.8 documentation for sdb but
nothing else; in 2.9 all references to sdb and the -g option
have disappeared. I would appreciate hearing from anyone with
experience using sdb, or any other symbolic debugger compatible
with version 2.8 or 2.9. I am also interested in finding out
why all references to sdb have been expunged from 2.9.
--
Jeff Percival
jwp@uwmacc.UUCP (...!{allegra,ihnp4,seismo,...}!uwvax!uwmacc!jwp)
uwmacc!jwp@wisc-rsch.ARPA
POST: Space Astronomy; UW-Madison; 1150 University Ave; Madison, Wi 53706; USA
------------------------------
Date: 17 Feb 85 22:09:47 GMT
From: jwp@uwmacc.UUCP (jeffrey w percival)
Subject: Unix 2.9 dump/restor
I am trying to get 2.9 installed on my 11/70, and have progressed to
the point of worrying about dumps and restors. I see a dump,restor
pair in /usr/src/cmd, and dump source (but no restor) in /usr/src/ucb/dump.
I see a dumprestor.h in /usr/include and in the ucb/dump area as well.
1. Will the non-ucb restor work with the ucb dump?
2. Does the ucb dumprestor.h completely supersede the one in /usr/include?
3. What about the standalone restor? Is that the same as the regular restor?
I remember in my 2.8 system having to massage some constants
until the standalone restor was < 48k... is that required in 2.9?
To summarize: how do I get a unified dump/restor (including standalone)?
I'd appreciate some mail on this. Thanks.
--
Jeff Percival
jwp@uwmacc.UUCP (...!{allegra,ihnp4,seismo,...}!uwvax!uwmacc!jwp)
uwmacc!jwp@wisc-rsch.ARPA
POST: Space Astronomy; UW-Madison; 1150 University Ave; Madison, Wi 53706; USA
------------------------------
Date: 1 Mar 85 20:06:16 GMT
From: tpsc-irt@DDN2.ARPA
Subject: 2.9 BSD on a PDP-11/24
Has anyone had any luck installing Berkeley 2.9BSD on a PDP-11/24?
(2 RL02 drives) We can boot from tape, make a file system, and install
the root file system, but when we try to boot rl(0,0)rlunix we get a
banner, the memory availible, and a panic trap type 11 (segmentation
violation). Any hints? Please reply personally, I really doubt if this
is a hot issue to most people.
Thanks in advance...
--A closed mouth gathers no foot...
Mark Fausett (tpsc-irt @DDN2)
------------------------------
End of Unix Technical Discussions
*****************************
--
Ronald W. Heiby / ihnp4!{wnuxa!heiby|wnuxb!netnews}
AT&T Information Systems, Inc.
Lisle, IL (CU-D21)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<420@wnuxb.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!bellcore!allegra!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!wnuxb!unix@cbosgd.UUCPShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site wnuxb.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!bellcore!allegra!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!wnuxb!unix@cbosgd.UUCP From: unix@cbosgd.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.unix Subject: Unix Technical Discussions V1 #7 Message-ID: <420@wnuxb.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Mar-85 13:29:06 EST Article-I.D.: wnuxb.420 Posted: Mon Mar 11 13:29:06 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 12-Mar-85 07:39:25 EST Sender: netnews@wnuxb.UUCP Organization: AT&T - Warrenville Data Center, IL Lines: 78 Keywords: NETUNIX HELPME BSD2.9 Approved: netnews@wnuxb.UUCP