🚀 go-pugleaf

heidi <heidi@micro.org> wrote:

>kgermann@shl.com (Kevin Germann) wrote:
>>In article <4939ha$joe@news.sas.ab.ca> johnf@fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca () writes:
>>>From: johnf@fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca ()
>>>Subject: Re: Separatists' words - listen to their plan....
>>>Date: 24 Nov 1995 02:09:46 GMT
>>
>>>Steve Juneau (sjuneau@bnr.ca) wrote:
>>
>>>:       D�sol�, mais ma langue naturelle n'�tant pas l'englais je n'avais
>>>:       pas fait la diff�rence.
>>
>>>Ich habe keine Idee, was Sie geschrieben haben.  Erzaelen Sie mir im 
>>>Deutsch bitte, was es meint.  Danke.
>>
>>Es tut mir leid, aber meine Muttersprache ist nicht englisch.  Ich habe kein 
>>unterschied gemerkt.  :-)
>>
>>Somehow french and english seem more appropriate languages for these 
>>newsgroups, though
>>
>>Kevin Germann (kgermann@shl.com)
>>
>>
>Ja, das ist wahr, es ist auch sehr shon wenn mann mehr sprachen schprict.
>They seem more appropriate, and probably are more appropriate, but it makes
>a good point.  Knowing more than one language is an advantage.

Dear Heidi Schmude,

	I completely agree with you.  Knowing more than one language is a
definite advantage and an asset.  It is an asset that will only grow
in the coming years.  
	AND, knowing more than one language does NOT detract from one's
culture at all.

Best wishes,
	Tiresius