🚀 go-pugleaf

svend@prison.com (Svend RobbingStores) wrote in message news:<iAChc.18$P72.10@edtnps84>...
> Yeah and I bet they're biased towards humans too.  why the hell would I vote 
> for Suzuki when I could vote for a tree?????
> 
> In article <4086e0e9$1_1@aeinews.>, Basilic@no.thanks says...
> >
> >I guess a lot of you hockey fans saw this commercial.
> >
> >The CBC has a contest where you, Joe/Jane Public, gets to nominate who the
> >Greatest Canadian is/was. After you nominate, they tally the votes and pick
> >a winner.
> >
> >Nothing wrong so far....but,
> >
> >on their web site, www.cbc.ca/greatest , 

Yup, just went there and nominated the Canadian of my choice.  And no,
it wasn't David Suzuki and no it wasn't a tree.

Cheers,
Heather



they offer a list of people to
> >choose from. No, you don't have to choose one of these, you could, in fact,
> >choose whomever you like, could be your neighbour.
> >
> >Now, going through this list I saw that they have listed non Canadians,
> >i.e.. Bell, Cartier, Champlain, Cunard (only made it to the C's). This is
> >quite deceiving, whereas some people could get the idea that these non
> >Canadians were actually Canadian, funny as it sounds.
> >
> >That's the rotten CBC for you. I've complained to them stating that they
> >should rename the contest, to something like "The most influential person
> >towards Canada" or modify the list to contain true Canadians (born here or
> >immigrated and became naturalized). We'll see if they do anything. IMO I
> >don't think so because the CBC are decievers and are quite BIASED.
> >
> >Having vented, go Suzuki go.
> >
> >
> >