🚀 go-pugleaf

Luc Richard <lranjou@login.net> writes:

>Scott N. wrote:

>> This is pure immature emotion talking. Separatism won't put food on the
>> table for your kids, it won't result in a promising future if Quebec
>> continues to have one of the highest unemployment rates in the G7 and
>> exists without social peace. And what is it with this National pride bit?
>> Tell me, what will it do for you? The inability of anyone to articulate
>> an intelligent case for a separate Quebec continues to be the only
>> constant is this mess.

>Poor Scott !

>L`�TRE PR�C�DE L`AVOIR !!!!

>Je sais qu`il est difficile pour un anglo-saxon de comprendre
>mais... prend ton temps, il faudra que tu prennes l`habitude
>car l`ind�pendance est in�vitable.

>La relation de *bons voisins* devra prendre le dessus sur tes 
>frustrations. Ne panique pas...Ton pays, le Canada, sera toujours retenu 
>artificillement au G-7. �a fait l`affaire de l`oncle SAM
>d`avoir un *yes man* bien assis � cot� de lui.

>Regards,

		What Luc is saying is that *being* is more
		important than *having*. In Quebec, and
		that seems hard for you to understand,
		what we *are* is important to us. And
		Canadians, we are not in our hearts and 
		souls. There is nothing you can do about
		it, sovereignty is unavoidable. 

		He also says something about Canada now
		owing its seat in the G7 to the fact that
		it is a sure ally for the US.

		Now my own:

		Recently -- and I think it was a Canadian
		who suggested it -- I read about Canada
		and Quebec being G7th A and G7th B. What
		would you think  (I said *think*, not
		rant or bark or erupt or spew hatred) about
		such a concept: a shared seat in the G7,
		both of us sitting side by side saying 
		YES to whatever the US want?

--