Article View: mtl.general
Article #253who's forcing whom to work?
From: Ken Quinn
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:19
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:19
42 lines
2433 bytes
2433 bytes
>Yes
R> Wow! What a great response. Just goes to show how little you
R> actually think. The majority of people work on the alternate schedules,
R> with a lot of them working on Sundays, your idea is
Thank you for your encouragement. A question was asked of me and I responded.
I didn't need to ramble on for pages and pages, as some people do. Your insult
("Just to show how little you think...") is quite the insulting remark,
though, and I ask that you please refrain from such remarks. They serve only
to irritate.
R> impracticle (sic) and unfair.
R> Why should Sunday be sacred? Just because the catholic church says so?
R> What about those who Sacred day is Saturday? What about those whose
sacred
R> days is Friday? Stop being a bigot, open your eyes.
My idea is neither impractical nor unfair. Why *should* Sunday be sacred? It
should be set aside as a family day so that mother, father, and children can
enjoy a day *together*. In this day and age where the divorce rate is high,
where there is apparently a lot of pressure on children, a day set aside to
relax and discuss the previous week's activities is, IMO, needed. Nowhere have
I mentioned the Roman Catholic Church (would it surprise you if I said I
wasn't Roman Catholic?). So why mention it? In this society where the
majority, I believe, are christian (if it identifies with anything at all),
Sunday is the logical choice. Friday is a business day. Saturday is already a
semi-business day. Why disrupt it? In any case, these are my ideas. If all you
can do is shoot them down *without* any constructive remarks, what is the
point?
Why are you calling me a bigot? Nowhere have I rigidly said it is 'my way, or
no way at all'. I have merely been thowing ideas out into the open. If you
don't like them, well tough. I will not cease expressing my opinions for your
mere benefit. Your accusation (that I am a bigot) is unfounded. Please don't
call me something I am not.
Regards,
Ken Quinn
(Ken.Quinn@f210.n514.z17.illusion.tpg.org)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<725179040.AA01318@illusion.tpg.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!clyde.concordia.ca!altitude!Nyongwa.CAM.ORG!illusion!UUCP.GatewayShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!clyde.concordia.ca!altitude!Nyongwa.CAM.ORG!illusion!UUCP.Gateway From: Ken.Quinn@f210.n514.z17.illusion.tpg.org (Ken Quinn) Newsgroups: mtl.general Subject: who's forcing whom to work? Message-ID: <725179040.AA01318@illusion.tpg.org> Date: 23 Dec 92 02:19:32 GMT Sender: UUCP.Gateway@illusion.tpg.org Lines: 42