Article View: mtl.general
Article #2697Re: Silly Argument
From: The Maloney's
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00
73 lines
5280 bytes
5280 bytes
MCMorin wrote in message <36313fbc.0@news.total.net>... >I was not talking to you, but can still answer your post. First I have >nothing to prove to anybody, especially you. That's really funny that you >say that the French were getting together to beat you, because exactly the >same thing happened to my when I was a kid. Those English assholes would >follow me and beat me up in a corner, but that was more like 10 of them. And >still some left teeth there... Probably just because I spoke only French, I >presume, because I was a really quiet boy. Regarding the manners, you do not >seem to be in a position to say that. You should look at the insulting posts >of ''Rick'' and see if you agree with that. Not really classy to my taste. > OK, paragon of virtue. In your original post you slandered all folks on the Prairies as people on welfare and not having the intellect to know where the Quebec is. All this because "Rick" upsets you? So you make a judgement on all people West of the Rideau!!! You get some manners or look to your own bigoted comments to see why you got trashed and beaten up. I have friends of a more diverse ethnic background than someone of your myopic perception could ever have. I do not immediately dislike anyone as soon as they open their mouth due to the language they speak or their place of residence or birth, nor do most Westerners. Just a few months ago I was driving down the Alaska Highway heading for Whitehorse and I picked up a hitchiker. He claimed to be Micmac(sp) and spoke only French. We talked in French(see I'm not stupid either) for the next 4 hours. >English and French people are too different to get along, it is the same old >story all the time. Not as long as there are people such as you who will not accept and respect our differences. >We want to separate not because we are sour of Canada or things like that, >we do not want English to give us more, we do not want to ask for things, we >can decide for ourselves what is good for us, not get on our knees and ask : >''Please, Mr English give me that, I will be a good boy''. I am sure you >guys will never understand that because you guys think that we are assholes, >cheap labor, under-educated and simple minded. This is false, I am sure that >we are smarter that you guys. Thats why this country has elected a PM from Quebec for how many years in the last 100? Yup, must be because we all think you are weak brained all right. > >To prove you that, all the people in the Prairies were amazed how smart I >was, but they never knew any French people. What's the conclusion? See the >end of the paragraph above. There you go generalizing again. Did it ever occur to you that they may think Quebecers are idiots (if they don't know any) because they only had you to use for comparison? IMHO, you seem like a whining child who wants to take his marbles and go home if he is outplayed, outsmarted or challenged on the rules of the game. You don't seem to get it. Westerners don't want Quebec to leave. We constantly hear of Quebecs "legitimate" concerns. Does it ever occur to you that the ROC may have "legitimate" concerns as well, and not with Quebec but with the Ottawa government? Answer one question and one only. If all the "legitimate" powers that Quebec wants are given to them, would you be prepared to offer those same powers to every province in Canada? Veto, language policy, finance etc. The whole enchilada. Can every province in Canada have the same powers, or are you still "distinct"?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<y7dY1.628$7m.658439@newsread.com!newshog.newsread.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3628ab6e.8771763@news.sprint.ca> <70bnv7$5gj$1@news.quebectel.com> <36296D90.23B7@axess.com> <70ehq0$ngi$1@news.quebectel.com> <362b1e78.2140586@news.sprint.ca> <70h82p$a8s$1@news.quebectel.com> <z6_W1.3$Zf5.46177@NewsRead.Toronto.iSTAR.net> <362cb3ac.0@news.cadvision.com> <Pine.OSF.3.96.981020132137.28106E-100000@alcor.concordia.ca> <362e1ba6.0@news.total.net> <Pine.OSF.3.96.981021153727.27045A-100000@alcor.concordia.ca> <362fa2d9.0@news.total.net> <3630a3d5.24804205@news.total.net> <362ff334.0@news.total.net> <e7aY1.580$7m.544975@newsread.com!newshog.newsread.com> <36313fbc.0@news.total.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f504b,defc9ea44e6cc9e0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: 114af9,defc9ea44e6cc9e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid114af9,public X-Google-Thread: 100c8e,defc9ea44e6cc9e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid100c8e,public X-Google-Thread: fc51e,defc9ea44e6cc9e0 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc51e,public X-Google-Thread: 102c8f,defc9ea44e6cc9e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid102c8f,public From: "The Maloney's" <gmaloney@cancom.net> Subject: Re: Silly Argument Date: 1998/10/23 Message-ID: <y7dY1.628$7m.658439@newsread.com!newshog.newsread.com> X-Deja-AN: 404518812 References: <3628ab6e.8771763@news.sprint.ca> <70bnv7$5gj$1@news.quebectel.com> <36296D90.23B7@axess.com> <70ehq0$ngi$1@news.quebectel.com> <362b1e78.2140586@news.sprint.ca> <70h82p$a8s$1@news.quebectel.com> <z6_W1.3$Zf5.46177@NewsRead.Toronto.iSTAR.net> <362cb3ac.0@news.cadvision.com> <Pine.OSF.3.96.981020132137.28106E-100000@alcor.concordia.ca> <362e1ba6.0@news.total.net> <Pine.OSF.3.96.981021153727.27045A-100000@alcor.concordia.ca> <362fa2d9.0@news.total.net> <3630a3d5.24804205@news.total.net> <362ff334.0@news.total.net> <e7aY1.580$7m.544975@newsread.com!newshog.newsread.com> <36313fbc.0@news.total.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role <abuse@cancom.net>, We Care <abuse@newsread.com> X-Trace: newsread.com!newshog.newsread.com 909205086 209.205.48.189 (Sat, 24 Oct 1998 00:58:06 EDT) Organization: Canadian Satellite Communications (cancom.net) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 00:58:06 EDT Newsgroups: mtl.general,qc.general,can.general,mcgill.general,concordia.general