🚀 go-pugleaf

As expected, you confirmed was I said in my earlier post. You guy are
clueless. You can read but you cannot understand. Too bad for you...

By the way, what I said is that I have known English on welfare in the
Prairies saying that Quebecers are manipulated by their politicians. Read it
again. I did not say that everybody was on welfare, i am not stupid, I know
that the highest percentage of welfare is here in Qu�bec.

So long, and sorry that you did not get what I said.


The Maloney's wrote in message ...
>
>MCMorin wrote in message <36313fbc.0@news.total.net>...
>>I was not talking to you, but can still answer your post. First I have
>>nothing to prove to anybody, especially you. That's really funny that you
>>say that the French were getting together to beat you, because exactly the
>>same thing happened to my when I was a kid. Those English assholes would
>>follow me and beat me up in a corner, but that was more like 10 of them.
>And
>>still some left teeth there... Probably just because I spoke only French,
I
>>presume, because I was a really quiet boy. Regarding the manners, you do
>not
>>seem to be in a position to say that. You should look at the insulting
>posts
>>of ''Rick'' and see if you agree with that. Not really classy to my taste.
>>
>OK, paragon of virtue.  In your original post you slandered all folks on
the
>Prairies as people on welfare and not having the intellect to know where
the
>Quebec is.  All this because "Rick" upsets you?  So you make a judgement on
>all people West of the Rideau!!!  You get some manners or look to your own
>bigoted comments to see why you got trashed and beaten up.
>
>I have friends of a more diverse ethnic background than someone of your
>myopic perception could ever have.  I do not immediately dislike anyone as
>soon as they open their mouth due to the language they speak or their place
>of residence or birth, nor do most Westerners. Just a few months ago I was
>driving down the Alaska Highway heading for Whitehorse and I picked up a
>hitchiker.  He claimed to be Micmac(sp) and spoke only French.  We talked
in
>French(see I'm not stupid either) for the next 4 hours.
>
>>English and French people are too different to get along, it is the same
>old
>>story all the time.
>
>Not as long as there are people such as you who will not accept and respect
>our differences.
>
>
>>We want to separate not because we are sour of Canada or things like that,
>>we do not want English to give us more, we do not want to ask for things,
>we
>>can decide for ourselves what is good for us, not get on our knees and ask
>:
>>''Please, Mr English give me that, I will be a good boy''. I am sure you
>>guys will never understand that because you guys think that we are
>assholes,
>>cheap labor, under-educated and simple minded. This is false, I am sure
>that
>>we are smarter that you guys.
>
>Thats why this country has elected a PM from Quebec for how many years in
>the last 100?  Yup, must be because we all think you are weak brained all
>right.
>>
>>To prove you that, all the people in the Prairies were amazed how smart I
>>was, but they never knew any French people. What's the conclusion? See the
>>end of the paragraph above.
>
>
>There you go generalizing again.  Did it ever occur to you that they may
>think Quebecers are idiots (if they don't know any) because they only had
>you to use for comparison?  IMHO, you seem like a whining child who wants
to
>take his marbles and go home if he is outplayed, outsmarted or challenged
on
>the rules of the game.
>
>You don't seem to get it.  Westerners don't want Quebec to leave.  We
>constantly hear of Quebecs "legitimate" concerns.  Does it ever occur to
you
>that the ROC may have "legitimate" concerns as well, and not with Quebec
but
>with the Ottawa government?
>Answer one question and one only.   If all the "legitimate" powers that
>Quebec wants are given to them, would you be prepared to offer those same
>powers to every province in Canada?  Veto, language policy, finance etc.
>The whole enchilada.  Can every province in Canada have the same powers, or
>are you still "distinct"?
>
>