Article View: mtl.general
Article #2799Re: concerning Valery Fabrikant: censored postings?
From: Robert Postuma
Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 00:00
44 lines
2787 bytes
2787 bytes
Tommy the Terrorist <mayday@super.zippo.com> wrote: >I'm making these postings by request; I've been told that they haven't >been showing up from Canadian accounts. I append the details of my >correspondence in the issue below, and will include the postings in >general in a series under the heading "concerning Valery Fabrikant". EXACTLY by who's request ???? >I know little about the case myself, but to the degree I understand it, a >piece of his personal E-mail referring to a judge as "Chief Injustice" >was referred to that judge, and incredibly, under Canadian law he was >subject to imprisonment for up to one year for that horrendous offense. >Facing the possibility of prison, he got a gun and shot four of the >people involved in the court case to death. An understandable impulse, >though I must register my regrets that the fine-minded lawmakers who >devised such a law were denied a fair share of the rewards. Nope== I never heard THAT version before. Fabrikant had "problems" with several people in his departement over RESEARCH CREDIT and his ACCREDITATIONS ( and whether he was qualified enough to remain in a research/teaching position ). Soooooooo.. one day, in a fit of revenge/anger/insanity/whatever you wanta call it - he brought a gun out and started firing in retaliation for this alleged "smear" against him. 4 innocent and good people DIED -- cause of this-- animal. I was lucky enough to not be in the university computer lab, less than 10 feet away from where this happened, when all this happened ( I was too tired that day for some reason ) -- I count myself LUCKY !! It's obvious you know little of the facts of the case-- and your ignorance SHOWS !! It wasn't an issue of free speech-- and even if it was-- was it worth 4 people dying so uyou could calla judge EVIL or whatever?? > >I'm still not certain that real censorship is going on here with these >postings I'm quoting now, but the "Stamler" message that I received by >E-mail and will post now is definitely NOT on Dejanews. We are BETTER off without the rants of a madman!! Rob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3554232d.2812170@news.odyssee.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6iu4ch$h3n@enews3.newsguy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f504b,5274bde7f16ddd57 X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: 114af9,5274bde7f16ddd57 X-Google-Attributes: gid114af9,public X-Google-Thread: fc51e,5274bde7f16ddd57 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc51e,public From: spindr@microtec.net (Robert Postuma) Subject: Re: concerning Valery Fabrikant: censored postings? Date: 1998/05/09 Message-ID: <3554232d.2812170@news.odyssee.net> X-Deja-AN: 351681666 References: <6iu4ch$h3n@enews3.newsguy.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 05:53:43 EDT Reply-To: spindr@microtec.net Newsgroups: mtl.general,can.general,concordia.general