🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:26:42 -0600, "ralph" <ralph@onehit.ca> wrote:

>
>"Alan Baggett" <canada.revenueagency@canada.com> wrote in message 
>news:1971293c-9798-4363-b30a-f64bd3633c80@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>On Jan 29, 2:03 pm, "J�m ����" <j...@mysockpuppet.invalid> wrote:
>> "Alan Baggett" <canada.revenue.age...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:41ce83c6-83db-414d-bf25-f92025517035@40g2000prx.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> This is a Canadian Tax Tale article that originates from, of all
>> places, The UAE (United Arab 
>> Emirates)http://www.aim168realestate.com/real-estate-news/canada/4525/canadian...
>>
>> Press Release
>> Staff Reporter
>> Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM UAE local time (GMT+4)
>> Replication or redistribution in whole or in part is prohibited
>> without prior approval from Aim 168 /Aim 168 Real Estate.
>>
>> And did you obtain the requisite "prior approval" noted above before
>> reproducing/redistributing that article here in the newsgroups?
>
>No.
>
>It was reproduced exactly as found with links to the site.
>
>Web articles have a notoriously brief lifespan - sometimes just 24
>hours before they disappear forever.
>
>
>
>
>The question was did you get "approval from Aim 168 /Aim 168 Real Estate."
>to post this before you posted it. You answered no. Do you always break 
>copyright? Do you think that is legal and right?
>If so why?


It says quite specifically "Replication or redistribution in whole or
in part is prohibited without prior approval from Aim 168 /Aim 168
Real Estate", he knows that he broke copyright in redistribution of
the piece. After checking their site, it seems that they have the
recourses to rap his fingers hard for this if they so intended.