🚀 go-pugleaf

nevins@no_canned_meat.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:46:56 -0600, Darren Gudmundson
> <iggy@mbnet.mb.ca> wrote:
> >
> >Over the past while I have read few of Barbara Amero's posts and for the
> >most part ignored them.

> >Some silly, some offensive, some just plain stupid and not worth
> >responding to - or reading for that matter.

Which means what I have to say threatens you.....

> >So what exactely is the problem here people?

> >If you don't like what she has to say:
> >
> > a). Dont't read it.
> > b). Counter punch.

    c). Reflect on why you don't like what she has to say.

> >Running to the ISP and whining until she's pulled is one of the lamest
> >things I've come across in a long time.
> >
> >It's really quite pathetic . . .

I'd say the assault on me and CCN was sorta like 
terrorism.
 
> It's been an interesting spectacle. 

Quite a few men and a couple of colonized women
has been an interesting spectacle.

> It has been amazing to watch the
> quasi-feminist debate like diatribe be reduced into the mob mentality
> and flame fest that it has. Good entertainment at a base level, kind
> of like watching all star tag team mud wrestling.

What I found amazing was to see all the attitudes, views held
about women since B.C. exposed in here... didn't expect to see
the "Woman the Temptress" view (put forth by John Jenkins Sr.).
It's not just amazing; it's right some disturbing, alarming.
There's lots more of you out there. At times reading some of the 
posts, I felt as tho' I was going to upchuck.

Barbara A. Amero