🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 20 Jan 1998 22:58:53 -0330, See@My.Sig wrote:

>On Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:50:39 GMT, w3spider@wpg.flame wrote to All:
>>On Mon, 19 Jan 1998 15:02:21 -0330, See@My.Sig wrote:
>>>On Sun, 18 Jan 1998 22:56:56 GMT, w3spider@wpg.flame wrote to All:
>>>>On Sat, 17 Jan 1998 20:55:35 GMT, daddio@nfld.rules.com (Big Daddio)
>>>>wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 17 Jan 1998 07:30:42 GMT, w3spider@wpg.flame wrote:

>>Yeah whatever blowhard, all you pinheads look alike to me. 
>
>Go get yourself some bifocals, Sweetheart. 

I'm not your Sweetheart. Daddio.

>Then you'll be able to see that not everyone looks like yourself. 

One does not require bifocals to distinguish you are an asshole.
Unless of course they have the fonts set too small in their
newsreader.

>You may even be able to read a header field.

I can read a header field just fine, that I make no distinction
between any of the daddio.censors is the point.

>No Spidey, I won't accept your apologies, no matter how low you grovel.

Strange sense of what an apology entails. However you're probably so
used to insults you've the mechanics confused.

>>And, I've been
>>posting under this pseudonym for longer than you've been on the net.

>Since the BBS days?  

I said the Net, idiot. As in Arpanet.

>Since 300 baud modems?  Come on kiddo! 

Geezus.

>>What's next contacting _my_ ISP? Go ahead we now have clear evidence
>>that you are a censorious bastard, and likely won't be taken seriously
>>again, but by all means feel free.
>
>Aaaw, Spidey!  That's really nice, but if you think that sucking up to me
>this way will win my approval, you're out to lunch.  

Do you stop to think how stupid you sound or do you just knee-jerk to
every post that comes your way? I don't give a shit about your opinion
of me one way or the other. The issue is you and the rest of the
net.geldings campaigning to have a user censored/removed because you
didn't have the good sense or intelligence to ignore her posts. I
realize this is a tactic you approve of and suggested you attempt to
employ it here. Of course I don't expect I'd get this past your
protruding brow if I used a jackhammer.

>Does your ISP know where you are?

Been stupid long, or did something fall on your head?

>>Your admission to owning a pet rock goes a long way to proving my
>>assertion that you're an idiot. Case closed I'd say.
>
>Not quite, Spidey.  I realise that you couldn't have a pet rock.  One must
>be more intelligent than one's pets. 

Obviously not in your case.

>I am looking for a pet Spidey to keep mine company. 

Try Wal-Mart, we get all my son's action figures there.

>But you're just too, too smarmy. 

I'd suggest you look that word up, oh nevermind, insults and idiots I
suppose.

>A whole beach full of pet rocks beneath my window just vetoed that idea.

Well I agree conversing with rocks would at least provide near
intellectual equality in your case. However I'm not sure about a
"beach full", be careful.

>No, No, Spidey...I'm not Einstein; Einstein is my pet rock!  

How appropriate you would select a name denoting superior intelligence
for your rock.

>I'm John Jenkins Sr., <daddio@thezone.net>, and your flattery is becoming
>embarassing. But you do seem to be extremely confused.

Nope, just indifferent to who you are. Ya don't get it, do ya?

>More sweet nothings...all to no avail. Your murmurings are misdirected.

That's not murmuring, it's the wind whistling through your vacuous
head.

>Strive on McDuff!  You'll find the right key sequence someday.

No need, I pegged you first time out.

>>No need for a hick like you to restate the obvious.
>
>'Hick'?  Is that a term of reverence among Spideymen? 

No it's a term for hick's.

>Don't grovel so!

Yawn.

>>I'm not whining pinhead, I'm performing a public service by allowing
>>you to continue to demonstrate the depth of your stupidity.
>>Congratulations on a job well-done.
>
>Yes, I see your point.  

The only point you could possibly see is the one on your head. 
Get a hat for it.

>I really shouldn't show you up this way, should I?

You couldn't show up a drunk chimp in a sign language experiment.

>Although I suspect that anyone reading this already understands that you
>have a severe disability. Call Dr K.  He'll help you out of your misery.

Heh heh heh, the last refuge of the floundering lamer "go kill
yourself". What a luzer.

>But I'll miss your sparkling wit.

You can't miss something you don't understand.

>>>>>I would suspect that after two years of this nonsense,
>>>>>they�re all breathing  deep sigh of relief over there. 

Actually it's the sound of laughter. We're glad you stopped by,
haven't had this much fun since the last feckless newbie stopped by
for a pummeling.

>>Heh heh heh, "I know you are but what am I", how beautifully apt you
>>senseless drone. Your pissant witch-hunt has exposed you as
>>net.gelding of gargantuan proportions. Please continue to flail away,
>>the idiocy coming out of your empty head does far more damage to your
>>character or lack thereof than I could ever achieve on my own.
>
>Aaah!  Poetry!  

You wouldn't recognize poetry if you were tattooed in the complete
works of Shakespeare.

>Free verse? Or just 'stream-of-consciousness' prose? Thank
>goodness I'm not obliged to analyse it. 

You misspelled "incapable", hope this helps.

>It is a little abstruse. 

Not at all, it's perfectly clear to those who are familiar with the
issues and have been reading your pathetic replies. 

>Matter of fact it could be pure nonsense.....

....if it weren't true. 

>>Heh heh heh, doesn't take any balls to expose a poseur like yourself.
>
>So you admit it. 

Yes, I admit you're a poseur, astute of you to notice.

>That's why you post in such a high-pitched voice! 

Stop projecting jenkins, people may think you're more of a fool than
you appear. Ah... strike that.

>I knew there was an undefinable something about you. 

The last thing you defined was stupid, by mailbombing CCN.

>>>Why not try delivering it in person? 

>>Well idiot, you're half way across the country from here, and
>>considering I wouldn't cross the street to piss on you if you were on
>>fire, highly unlikely.
>
>Now that's the nicest thing you've said in this response, Spidey. 

You may be right, I never noticed.

>I wish I could say the same to you, but I would find it hard to resist if >the situation were reversed.  

Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.

>But I'd be very careful to direct the stream on to the parts of you which >weren't aflame.

No doubt I'd be incinerated before you found your dick.

>>>Can't get the time off from grade school? 
>>
>>See, this is what happens when the lame attempt to flame. Stick to
>>bullying the Amero's of this world sonny, you stand a much better
>>chance of having any affect whatsoever.
>
>Exactly.  Lamers can't be flamers. 

Your mantra, I hope.

>Your efforts prove that. 

Not by the scorecards I've seen. Then again you wouldn't know a flame
if you were falling into the sun.

>My pet rock's about 1000% more effective than yourself. 

I'm sure it tells you whatever you want to hear. Ya goof.

>But keep trying kid, you'll get the knack.

I haven't even started yet.

>>You've redefined stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid.  Meta-stupid.
>>Stupid collapsed on itself.  Stupid so dense that no intellect can
>>escape, kind of stupid.  Singularity stupid. 
>
>Are you trying to tell me your real life name?  

IKYABWAI. Yawn.

>Let's see if I can guess...
>Yep! I think I know!  And I understand the reason for your use of a
>pseudonym.

Shaddup, you don't even understand why people took issue with your
actions to begin with.

>>In short, if I traded you for shit, I would lose the container I
>>brought you in.

>You must be a lousy trader, Spidey.  

C'mon, you're putting everyone to sleep with this lame crap.

>You'd likely lose your car while filling it with gas.

Only if I filled it from your head, Oh Bilious One.

>I find your foibles quite endearing.

Great, stop by anytime, and we can continue your beating.

>>Have a nice day.

>Thank you. You too.

No worries there, I have lot's of practice.

>John Jenkins Sr.  -  daddio@thezone.net
>(Note, dear Spidey, that this sig is *not* that of "daddio@nfld.rules.com
>(Big Daddio)".  Getting any hint of a clue yet?)  

Spare me your explanations of the "daddio circle-jerk", I couldn't
care less which one of you twits takes credit for your collective
stupidity.
______
spider

Free Flames
email: w3spider@wpg.flame