🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:50:39 GMT, w3spider@wpg.flame wrote to All:
>On Mon, 19 Jan 1998 15:02:21 -0330, See@My.Sig wrote:
>>On Sun, 18 Jan 1998 22:56:56 GMT, w3spider@wpg.flame wrote to All:
>>>On Sat, 17 Jan 1998 20:55:35 GMT, daddio@nfld.rules.com (Big Daddio)
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 17 Jan 1998 07:30:42 GMT, w3spider@wpg.flame wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Indeed, that some weak-sister like "Big Daddio" (aka John Jenkins sr)
>>>>>could "rally the troops" in such a way as to have the exec of this
>>>>>obviously laudable organization bow to his juvenile campaign certainly
>>>>>scares the hell out of me. (Make no mistake, Chebucto has contributed
>>>>>quite some experience to the promotion and development of the Internet
>>>>>in Canada)
>>>>
>>>>>spider
>>
>>Ho  Hum.....  Someday Spiderman will learn how to read the header fields.
>>Until then, those of us who can already read them can chuckle over his
>>misdirected drivel.
>
>Yeah whatever blowhard, all you pinheads look alike to me. 

Go get yourself some bifocals, Sweetheart. Then you'll be able to see that
not everyone looks like yourself. You may even be able to read a header
field.
>
>>Here's a clue, Spidey.  I'd suggest you put it with your others, but you
>>don't have any others.
>>
>>			CLUE
>>If I wanted to use an anonymous remailer, which I don't, I'd be almost as
>>stupid as yourself to do so under my real userid.  
>>			CLUE
>
>This isn't an anonymous remailer you witless wanker. 

No Spidey, I won't accept your apologies, no matter how low you grovel.
BTW, who said you were using an AR?  

>And, I've been
>posting under this pseudonym for longer than you've been on the net.

Since the BBS days?  Since 300 baud modems?  Come on kiddo! 

>What's next contacting _my_ ISP? Go ahead we now have clear evidence
>that you are a censorious bastard, and likely won't be taken seriously
>again, but by all means feel free.

Aaaw, Spidey!  That's really nice, but if you think that sucking up to me
this way will win my approval, you're out to lunch.  Does your ISP know
where you are?
>
>>As I have a pet rock which is brighter than you, I doubt that this'll help.
>
>Your admission to owning a pet rock goes a long way to proving my
>assertion that you're an idiot. Case closed I'd say.

Not quite, Spidey.  I realise that you couldn't have a pet rock.  One must
be more intelligent than one's pets. I am looking for a pet Spidey to keep
mine company. But you're just too, too smarmy. A whole beach full of pet
rocks beneath my window just vetoed that idea.
>
>>Perhaps you could borrow someone else's pet rock and get it to explain to
>>you.
>
>I don't know anyone stupid enough to own one, Einstein. And although
>you may garner all your clues from it, I find it much more pleasurable
>to simply slap the rockheads like yourself so you can continue to
>demonstrate you inadequacy. 

No, No, Spidey...I'm not Einstein; Einstein is my pet rock!  I'm John
Jenkins Sr., <daddio@thezone.net>, and your flattery is becoming
embarassing. But you do seem to be extremely confused.

>>>>Imagine that  
>>>>A weak sister rallying what must be a bunch of mindless drones.
>>>
>>>No kidding. Asshole.

More sweet nothings...all to no avail. Your murmurings are misdirected.

>>Hey....your vocabulary's improving. A seven-letter word!
>
>Just striving for accuracy.

Strive on McDuff!  You'll find the right key sequence someday.
>
>>>>Seems to me if anything, that sound gender feminist tactics 
>>>>were at work here.
>>>
>>>Ya haven't even the vaguest hint of clue do you?
>>
>>Marvellous...... You're so eloquent!
>
>No need for a hick like you to restate the obvious.

'Hick'?  Is that a term of reverence among Spideymen? Don't grovel so!

>>>>Otherwise there was nothing stopping you from volunteering and
>>>>lifting some of the load off of CCN's shoulders.
>>>
>>>A load created by your incessant whining and pure bad sense. 
>>>Screw that.
>>
>>Spidey'd rather sit there and whine. A totally inconsequential nothing. 
>
>I'm not whining pinhead, I'm performing a public service by allowing
>you to continue to demonstrate the depth of your stupidity.
>Congratulations on a job well-done.

Yes, I see your point.  I really shouldn't show you up this way, should I?
Although I suspect that anyone reading this already understands that you
have a severe disability. Call Dr K.  He'll help you out of your misery.
But I'll miss your sparkling wit.
>
>>>>I would suspect that after two years of this nonsense,
>>>>they�re all breathing  deep sigh of relief over there. 
>>>
>>>I'm quite sure Chebucto appreciated you setting yourself up to be the
>>>censor of their service. 
>>--
>>>Fuckhead.
>>
>>ZZZZzzz  ZZZZZZzzz..... Oh!  You're still blabbering are you?  Is that last
>>word your sig file?  It sure suits you.
>
>Heh heh heh, "I know you are but what am I", how beautifully apt you
>senseless drone. Your pissant witch-hunt has exposed you as
>net.gelding of gargantuan proportions. Please continue to flail away,
>the idiocy coming out of your empty head does far more damage to your
>character or lack thereof than I could ever achieve on my own.

Aaah!  Poetry!  Free verse? Or just 'stream-of-consciousness' prose? Thank
goodness I'm not obliged to analyse it. It is a little abstruse. Matter of
fact it could be pure nonsense........

>>>>They did their part now it's Dbis's turn.
>>>
>>>You're an asshole jenkins, it's too bad I can't email you a kick in
>>>the nuts.
>>
>>Why?  Envious just because you don't have any? 
>
>Heh heh heh, doesn't take any balls to expose a poseur like yourself.

So you admit it. That's why you post in such a high-pitched voice! I knew
there was an undefinable something about you. 

>>Why not try delivering it in person? 
>
>Well idiot, you're half way across the country from here, and
>considering I wouldn't cross the street to piss on you if you were on
>fire, highly unlikely.

Now that's the nicest thing you've said in this response, Spidey. I wish I
could say the same to you, but I would find it hard to resist if the
situation were reversed.  But I'd be very careful to direct the stream on
to the parts of you which weren't aflame.

>>Can't get the time off from grade school? 
>
>See, this is what happens when the lame attempt to flame. Stick to
>bullying the Amero's of this world sonny, you stand a much better
>chance of having any affect whatsoever.

Exactly.  Lamers can't be flamers. Your efforts prove that. My pet rock's
about 1000% more effective than yourself. But keep trying kid, you'll get
the knack.

>You've redefined stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid.  Meta-stupid.
>Stupid collapsed on itself.  Stupid so dense that no intellect can
>escape, kind of stupid.  Singularity stupid. 

Are you trying to tell me your real life name?  Let's see if I can guess...
Yep! I think I know!  And I understand the reason for your use of a
pseudonym.

>In short, if I traded you for shit, I would lose the container I
>brought you in.

You must be a lousy trader, Spidey.  You'd likely lose your car while
filling it with gas. I find your foibles quite endearing.

>Have a nice day.
>
Thank you. You too.
>______
>spider
>Free Flames
>email: w3spider@wpg.flame

John Jenkins Sr.  -  daddio@thezone.net
(Note, dear Spidey, that this sig is *not* that of "daddio@nfld.rules.com
(Big Daddio)".  Getting any hint of a clue yet?)  










































x