🚀 go-pugleaf

admiral@ilos.net (Arthur D. Mira) writes:

>In wpg.general, mdf@vigard.mef.org (Matthew Francey) wrote:
>
><snip of clueless rambling>
>
>=>Hm.  Yeah.  Do keep using that "X-No-Archive".  Having current or
>=>potential employers discover you can't form a rational argument
>=>could spell trouble ...
>=>--
>=>Matthew Francey | VE3RQX | NAD27: 43o40.6617'N 079o18.5171'W
>+0116.5m
>
>Isn't this a telling statement!

HA!  Hook, line and sinker!

The only thing that can be "told" is that Mira *still* can't, or
won't, defend his position.  His attempts at re-directing the debate
are about as pathetic as those used by John Angus.

>The whacko antic's of the Barbara Amero's of the world are the least
>of anyone's concern. If you don't climb into the sty with her, you
>won't get pig shit on yourself.

Mira, the only people covered in shit here are the dickheads who
attacked CCN to get someone's account ditched.  These same individuals
are now complaining that either (a) CCN made the "right" decision,
but for the "wrong" reasons, (b) how horrible the situation at CCN
must have been during the attack, even offering *donations* to
the organization they were previously attacking.

You have had ample oppurtunity to condemn these actions -- especially
during your attack against a simple media item.  Yet have chosen to
remain silent -- and by inference are an unindicted co-conspirator.

>On the other hand Francey is the type of sick mentality that
>electronically slithers across the newsgroups from time to time.

Right.  Because I have "a life" (apparently to have such is to
be of "sick mentality") but occasionally find it highly amusing to
poke at morons such as John Angus, beergut/Arthur D. Mira, and the
like.  The reactions are always -- no exceptions to date -- an
awesome outburst of idiocy.

For a small example, in your case, you offered me this advice:

	>You don't have to like what I post, you don't have to read it,
	>and you sure and fuck don't have to respond to it, [...]

Yet somehow you refuse to take it yourself!

>One who would use public discussion and unguarded comments as a
>*weapon* to seek revenge on those he would consider to be 'not up to
>snuff'.

What exactly is your problem with accepting responsibility for your
words, Mira?  After all, you hold Amero to this standard, do you not?
And just who is at fault if *you* choose to make "unguarded comments"
in a "public discussion"?

And who the fuck are you to complain about using these as a "weapon"
to "seek revenge" -- when this is *EXACTLY* what your ilk did to Amero?

Hypocrisy seems to be your forte, Mira.

As to whether or not I think you are "up to snuff", I recommend you
do *not* ask me this question.
--
Matthew Francey | VE3RQX | NAD27: 43o40.6617'N 079o18.5171'W +0116.5m