🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 15 Dec 1996 14:49:40 -0700, aartvark <aartvark@worldgate.com>
wrote:

>Arleigh Burke wrote:
>
>>         I really do not understnad you folks.  During the thirties up until
>> the actual outbreak of hostilities, when Nazi Germany was rapidly
>> becoming a pariah among nations, the only certain friend they had was
>> the Zionist Movement.
>> 
>>         That can possibly be explained by both of them planning and working
>> for the destruction of European Jewry.  Of course the Zionists
>> envisioned it and organized to accomplish it before Hitler was born.
>> Perhaps that is where Hitler got the idea.
>> 
>>         In any event it is unclear why pointing out there is no physical
>> evidence for the holocaust has anything to do with "goosestepping" or
>> some variation upon the line.  Perhaps you could explsin.
>> 
>> =====
>> If history has taught us anything it is that history will be revised.
>
>Curious, Matt. This Zionist plan for exterminating European Jewry and
>the Zionist/Nazi alliance - you have physical evidence? 

	I said "destruction of European Jewry" and that is what I meant to
say.  It was clear that their objective was as that is what they said.
They wanted Jews to return to Palestine.  Hitler wanted them out of
Europe.  It is clear they had convergent objectives.  

After all, you
>place a lot of importance on physical evidence, so it would be
>hypocritical to accept such a theory without any. Building your world
>view on "possibly" leaves you vulnerable to refutation. If we have no
>physical evidence, then it's a case of eyewitness testimony, isn't it?
>So do you just trust whomever you trust?
>Maybe I don't know as much about history as you. Please provide me with
>your evidence.

	If on the other hand you wish to claim that it was not the
objective of Zionism to have all Jews return to Palestine I will not
bother with the effort to establish fact as their objective and
policy.  

=====
If history has taught us anything it is that history will be revised.
---
Revisionists are sneaky bastards, always relying on facts and figures.