🚀 go-pugleaf

> I agree with most thinking people, that the HOLOHOAX is strictly an
> international swindle on non-Jews, to extort money!!!

Really!! So you say that, in order to be a "thinking" person, you have
to believe that the most thoroughly documented event in history was a
hoax... tell me, do you also believe that the Apollo moon landing was
staged and that Elvis faked his own death?

> Actually, the term HOLOCAUST originally referred to the Turkish slaughter
> of the Armenians in the early 1900's. The termn was then used by jew pr
> hacks as their term for the alleged people who disappeared in WWII.

REALLY!! And all along, I thought that "holocaust" was a Greek word for
a burnt sacrifice. In fact, the term "holocaust" [with a lower-case "h"]
acquired its modern meaning of genocide or slaughter in the 18th
century. Since that time, the term has been used to describe
particularly humilliating and costly military defeats -- the charge of
the Light Brigade at Balaklava was referred to as a "holocaust" in st
least one contemporary news report -- or other horrific loss of human
lives.

The Armenian Genocide HAS been described as a Holocaust, though at the
time it occurred it was barely described at all in the Western press.
The term "Holocaust," with a capital "H," became current for the Nazi
crimes very soon after the end of the war. I have found at least one use
of the term in the New Yok Times as early as July, 1945.

However, arguing over the proper lexicology does not change the fact
that it happened.

> Only the damn JEWS consider questioning the holohoax to be anti-semitic.
> Respected authors such as Irving, for example, have well documented cases
> contradicting the jewish version of events in WWII.

I haven't the time or the inclination to discuss Mr. Irving's alleged
credentials. I would, however, direct you to the Nizkor Project home
page at http://nizkor.almanac.bc.ca/, where you will find some every
enlightening documentation about Mr. Irving. You have to keep in mind
that, just because he CALLS himself a historian doesn't make him one.

> Reading about who controls media in most western nations, as well as who
> controls movies, leads to the logical conclusion that JEWS are attempting
> to distort history, and public perception, to their own ends.

So you would say there **IS** an international Jewish conspiracy, no?
You **ARE** saying that the Jews -- as a group, no less -- are all a
bunch of dirty liars, no?

Thus you are an anti-semite.

I'm not going to argue the pros or cons of anti-Semitism, I only wish to
point out that, if you believe that the Holocaust was a hoax, then you
must, by definition, be an anti-semite.

> Now that thinking people, especially in Quebec are questioning the
> incidents with a JEWISH aspect, Quebecers are no longer prepared to accept
> the Jewish versions of history.

What really bugs me is the BIGGER hoax -- the one that says the Japanese
LOST the second World War. They WON, after dropping an atomic bomb on
San Diego, but they've created this hoax that the ALLIES bombed THEM to
drum up international sympathy, so no one would notice that they'd taken
over the world! But thinking people, especially Quebecers are no longer
going to accept the Japanese versions of history!

> After all what about the JEW BRONFMAN, who illegally moved more than 2.2
> BILLION dollars out of Quebec and Canada, without paying the Income Taxes
> on it? This resulted in tens of thousands more unemployed in Quebec.

What, exactly, has this to do with the Holocaust? I guess you're just
trying to show how evil and nasty those dirty Jews are, eh?

> What about the Canadian Jewish Congress forcing the resignation of the
> popular Quebec Lieutenant Governor M.Roux?

The funny thing is that it was the Pure Laine Nationalists who (a)
started the whole controversy, (b) called for his resignation, and (c)
forced him out. The CJC merely demanded an explanation --0 which is a
VERY far way from demanding a resignation.

Isn't it ironic that the Jews are being blamed for what the Nationalists
did?

More "revisionism," I think. Whenever something happens... BLAME THE
JEWS!

> What about the JEW Howard Galganov, formerly with the Jewish terrorist
> Group called Jewish defence League, and his anti-Quebec activities?

Hey... what about all those Quebecois politicians and Civil servants who
were members of the FLQ? Mr. Galganov, for all of his faults, was never
involved in a murder.

> What about the Bnai Brith Jews, now openly supporting Presto Manning and
> the western Reform Party?

What! Supporting the political party of your choice is a crime in Canada
now? I guess I'm a REAL criminal for voting for the NDP in the last
federal election, and for the Liberals in the last provincial election.

> You still did not respond to the above point made, namely why should the
> more than 98% of non-JEWS in Quebec have to obey the French label laws,
> while only the cursed JEWS are able somehow to avoid the laws of sovereign
> Quebec? The Catholics and Christians of other sects MUST obey the laws,
> while the JEWS break the laws with impunity.

Ummm... the story went like this... There ARE exceptions to the language
charter, one of which deals with food and products required for
religious purposes that is imported from outside Quebec. For a short
period, the Quebec government is supposed to accept the presebce of such
products, with non-French labels, on the understanding that (a) it is
temporary, and (b) the products are required for religious observance.

Quite simple, really... but entire legal. No laws broken there.

Let's get this straight, son... You believe that the Jews are
FOREIGNERS, that they are somoehow polluting the pristine culture of
Quebec, and that they are all part of a conspiracy... AND that the
Holocaust was a hoax...

You sound like an anti-Semite to me...

An idiot... AND an anti-Semite...

Matt