🚀 go-pugleaf

In message <4bigjj$k0b@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca> - jaf@sarastro.sun.csd.unb.ca (Tony 
Fitzgerald) writes:
:>
:>In article <4b4g8o$6v8@bottom.mts.net>, Tom Cohoe <cpianot@mts.net> wrote:
:>>Have done a little more thinking about this "fact".  The amount of time 
:>>that people tend to be in contact with family members is several billion 
:>>times greater than the amount of time they spend in contact with "armed 
:>>intruders".  This means that an armed intruder is several hundred million 
:>>times more dangerous to be in contact with then a family member is.
:>
:>Of course the other side to this coin is that the gun kept for
:>"protection" is a constant threat and danger to family members while
:>providing questionable protection against an extremely unlikely event.

I think the government is a constant threat and danger.  I wonder how many 
people are dead due to family violence and suicides caused by the stress of 
economic hardship caused by governments taxing away over 50% of the product 
of society's labour.  I wonder how many "experts" are employed in 
rationalizing the expenditures of the "choice" lost to taxation.  

Your "other side of the coin" missed mentioning the "man" who would have 
access to the 'gun kept for "protection"'.  Part of your side of the coin 
is that it is an even greater threat and danger to family members to have the 
"man" present without locked handcuffs on his wrists, gun or no gun.

I wonder if you are aware that C68 is an act of intimidation and violence.  
Does the hard time for not obeying authority fail to impress you?  What would 
it take to impress you?  If the penalty for failing to register a firearm 
were summary execution, would you be able to understand it?

The terrorism in C68 alone gives me profound confidence that it is a work of 
great immorality.  Wake up.

                    Tom Cohoe