🚀 go-pugleaf

ag414@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Colin R. Leech) wrote:

>Garry B. Dormody (gdormody@calvin.stemnet.nf.ca) writes:
>> The funny part is
>> I don't see why you feel threatened by the legal guns.

>A gun lying around the house is *much* more likely to be used in a
>domestic dispute than in its intended use: the unlikely event that you
>confront an intruder in your house.

Whoa, slow down there cowboy!!  You are not allowed to shoot anyone
intruding into your house.  Even if he is there to kill you and you
know he is coming.  If fact, it is your duty to protect him and insure
his safety while he is breaking the law.  My firearms are here in my
place only for shooting targets in an approved range.  If someone
broke into my place (and it has happened) I would have to get at least
three key rings stored in different areas (passing him in the
livingroom while he unhooks my VCR).  I would then have to go to the
storage area (not telling where) to unlock the offending firearm from
the double locks.  I would then go back (and pass him in the kitchen
making a sandwich with my big unregistered butcher knife) to fetch the
ammunition also locked in a different area.  In short, killing people
is not the intended use of my firearms.  I assure you as well that I
am not going to kill anyone in a 'domestic dispute'.

BTW, aren't you in the army?  If so, I bet my bottom dollar that you
must be an officer.  Read your posts again and figure out what your
mistake is. :)

DROP AND GIVE ME TWENTY, SIR!!!! :)

>At the very least, it would slow down somebody who breaks into a private
>house and steals a weapon.

Gee, I thought that was what my trigger lock and safe were for.

Chris McLeod.
chris.mcleod@sasknet.sk.ca

    "I do not expect this bill to have any effect on violent
    crime in Canada."
                                           -Allan Rock.
                                            Minister of Justice.